The most prominent social criticism in Chaucer's
            The Canterbury Tales is targeted at the church and its
            leaders.
In "The Prologue," for instance, the friar
            arranges marriages for women that he has impregnated.  The naive narrator presents this
            as if it is a good thing--the friar takes care of his people kind of thing.  But of
            course, it's not a good thing.  The reader understands
            this. 
Religious figures are, for the most part, presented
            as corrupt, greedy, arrogant, prideful.  They are confidence, or con
            men.
"The Pardoner's Tale," for another example, reveals
            how the pardoner blatantly uses a story about greed to fulfill his own greed.  The
            pardoner is very up front about the fact that he is just out to separate his listeners
            from their money. 
When analyzing in search of social
            criticism, remember that Chaucer uses irony here.  He uses the merry, naive narrator to
            present characters in what seems to be a positive light.  The reader should understand,
            though, that some of the characters are not positive at all.  Just because the
            unreliable narrator is gullible and accepts people as they are, doesn't mean the reader
            has to.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment