Saturday, December 31, 2011

If log a = 35 and log b= 20 calculate : log (ab) , log (a/b) , log (1/a) and log (1/b)

Given that:


log a =
35


log b = 20


We need to
calculate the values of the following:


1.log
(ab)


We will use the logarithm properties to
solve.


We know that log a + log b  = log
ab


==> log ab = 35 + 20 =
55


==> log ab =
55


2. log
a/b


We know that: log a - log b = log
a/b


==> log a/b = 35 -20 =
15


==> log a/b =
15


log
(1/a)


Let us rewrite as a negative
exponent.


==> log 1/a = log
a^-1


Now we know that log a^b = b*log
a


==> log a^-1 = - log a = -
35


==> log (1/a) =
-35


4. log (1/b) = log b^-1 = -1*log b =
-1*20 = -20


==> log (1/b) =
-20

Friday, December 30, 2011

In Antigone, how does Creon act unwise? How does Antigone act wise?

In Antigone, Creon acts unwisely by
refusing to heed the advice of others who try to counsel him.  For example, the blind
prophet Teiresias tries to tell Creon that the people of Thebes stand behind Antigone's
decision to bury Polyneices and that they feel sympathy for her situation.  Teiresias is
known throughout Thebes as a voice of truth, yet Creon does not listen to him.  Instead,
Creon insults Teiresias by assuming that he has been bribed to take Antigone's side in
the matter. 


On the other hand, Antigone acts wisely by not
allowing the baseless threats of others influence her decision to do what she believes
is morally the right thing to do.  Ismene disagrees with her sister about the burial of
Polyneices and tells Antigone that she will suffer terrible consequences as a result of
her decision.  However, Ismene speaks out of fear and a false sense of loyalty to Creon,
so Antigone is wise to disregard Ismene's words.

What are the similarities between the poems "Out, Out -" by Robert Frost and "Empty-Cradle Sad" by Bette Wolf Duncan?

1. Both the
poems are based on true life
incidents:


Frost's poem is based on a true
incident which is believed to have happened in April 1915; Raymond Fitzgerald, the son
of Frost’s friend and neighbour, lost his hand to a buzz saw and bled so profusely that
he went into shock, and died of cardiac arrest in spite of the best efforts of the
doctor.  Frost’s title invites us to compare the poem’s shocking story with Macbeth’s
speech on learning of his wife’s death:


The key to
understanding the theme of Frost's "Out, out-" lies in the intertextual reference to
Shakespeare's "Macbeth" Act V Sc.5, where Macbeth
soliloquizes bitterly on the futility of life after he learns of the death of his
wife:


readability="14">

Out, out, brief
candle!

Life's but a walking shadow, a poor
player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is
heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and
fury,
Signifying
nothing.



Frost's poem
ironically comments on the death of a small boy who dies tragically at such a young age
because of an accident when he was sawing wood.  His life is compared to a "brief
candle."


Bette Wolf Duncan's poem deals with an incident
which took place in the life of her late husband's grandmother. The mother in the poem
is her husband's grandmother and the infant is her
father-in-law.


2. Out door
work:
Frost's poem describes a group of people sawing wood. Bette Wolf
Duncan's poem describes the mother engaged in agricultural
operations:


readability="7">

Down below, with seeds and hoe,
Emma
sowed the garden
ground.



3.
Children are at the center of both the poems.
In Frost's poem it was a
small boy and  in Bette Wolf Duncan's poem it was a new born
baby.

What is the meaning of this line from As You Like It: "but as all is mortal in nature, so is all nature in love mortal in folly?"Said by Touchstone...

This is the ending line from Touchstone's speech in which
he makes fun of lovers and the things they say.  Here, Touchstone is saying that all
people who are in love act in stupid ways.  He is also implying, though, that the
foolishness does not last.


First, Touchstone says that all
in nature is mortal, meaning that everything that is natural will die sometime.  He then
says that the nature of love is to be foolish.  This is what he has been trying to get
across by all his silliness about kissing cows' udders and such.  Finally, he is saying
that the folly of love is mortal just like everything in the natural
world.


Overall, then, he is saying something along the
lines of "Everything in nature dies sometimes and so does the foolishness of people in
love."

Solve the system of equations algebraically x^2+y^2=100 x-y=2

Given:-


(x^2) + (y^2) = 100
..........(1)


x - y =
2...........(2)


Squaring (2) on both sides we
get


(x-y)^2 = (2)^2


or, (x^2)
+ (y^2) - 2xy = 4


Putting the value of (x^2) + (y^2) from
(1) in the above equation we get


100 - 2xy =
4


or, 2xy =
96...........(3)


Now, (1) + (3)
 gives


(x^2) + (y^2) + 2xy = 100 +
96


or, (x+y)^2 = 196


or,
(x+y)^2 = (14)^2


or, (x+y) =
14.........(4)


or, (x+y) =
-14..........(5)


Now, (2) + (4)
gives


2x = 16


or, x =


Thus, y =
6...........(6)


Also, (2) + (5)
gives


2x = -12


or, x =
-6


Thus, y =
-8..........(7)


Hence the two values of (x,y) are (8,6)
& (-6,-8)

Thursday, December 29, 2011

The right angled triangle ABC has AB=6, BC=8 and AC is the hypotenuse. Find sinA, cosA and tanA.

Given the the right angle triangle ABC such that AC is the
hypotenuse.


Then, the right angle is
B.


==> Given the legs
are:


AB = 6


BC =
8


Then, we will calculate the hypotenuse AC using the
formula.


==> AC^2 = BC^2 +
AB^2


==> AC^2 = 6^2 + 8^2 = 36+64 =
100


==> AC = 10


Now we
need to find the following:


sinA = opposite/
hypotenuse.


We know that the side that is opposite to the
angle A is BC


==> sinA = BC/AC = 8/10 =
4/5


==> cosA = adjacent/
hypotenuse


                 = AB/AC = 6/10 =
3/5


==> tanA = sinA/cosA =
4/3


==> sinA = 0.8


==>cosA =
0.6


==> tanA =
4/3

In Dylan's poem "Blowing in the Wind," what is meant by the lines "How many times must a man look up/Before he can see the sky"?

Bob Dylan's song combines the romantic and the political
quite beautifully. The two strands complement each other in the song. In these lines,
Dylan comes back to the central question of what does it take to be human, which he
keeps repeating in different forms throughout the song. He examines the values of human
experience, the limits to human tolerance, indifference and habituality, before it all
breaks free in the revolutionary upsurge--" How many years will it take till we
know/That too many people have died".


These questions are
rather unanswerable and the answer will always be blowing in the wind. In the lines
quoted in the question, Dylan questions the onset of intuition, sensibility and
awareness in temporal terms. How many occasions does a man need to arouse his sense of
insight into his own social responsibility. However, at a more individual level, the
lines may also refer to the timing of epiphanic knowledge. The following lines make the
sense clear--"How many years must one man have/Before he can feel, he can cry". This is
a clarion-call to man's waning sensibility at the wake of social
disasters.

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

What is the poem "Burial Detail," by Andrew Hudgins (written in the voice of Sidney Lanier) about?

"Burial Detail" is about burying bodies after a battle
during the Civil War. The speaker is a young solider (Sidney Lanier) who volunteers for
the burial detail. (The character is real, but the story is by
Andrew Hudgins.)


The process is described: a layer of dead
men is put down and then covered with lime—to stop the outbreak of cholera. Then another
layer of the dead are placed, covered by another layer of lime. The work continues all
day and into the night.


The speaker admits that each of the
dead is supposed to be checked for valuables, but it was enough just to move them and
cover them—anything more would be too much for him to bear. He tries not to look at
their faces, but he catches glimpses of a face that looks familiar—like his father,
cousins, even his mother...and then one that looks like him. He
feels a kinship to these men, though they are strangers.


At
one point, the speaker faints:


readability="10">

Then, my knees gave. I dropped my shovel
 and
pitched, face first, into the half-filled trench. 
I woke almost immediately, and stood

on someone's chest while tired hands pulled me
out.



Ironically, even in
death, the chests of the dead men were stronger than the mud and muck they had marched
through in Virginia to fight in this place. For almost a week, the speaker is the object
of lame jokes because he fainted, though he was not the only one to do
so.


The stranger seems to think there is some irony is his
fainting:


readability="8">

You'd think I would have fainted for my
father,
for some especially mutilated boy,
for Clifford or my
mother. Not for myself.



The
young soldier describes the relief of a nighttime breeze, from a storm brewing nearby.
It feels good, but the bodies also need moisture to start to decay. This point is
important to him because he and others have argued the point: he believes the dead will
decay and become a part of the earth again, but others say this is not so...the bodies
will remain this way forever. And the young man needs to believe the bodies will become
a part of the land again; he needs to know that when it is his turn to die, he will once
again become a part of the earth: and in this way, he and the dead he buries will be the
same.


As the dawn comes to light the field once more, in
the near-darkness, the soldier sees something beautiful. In the dim and shifting light,
he only sees pale colors, laid out in an abstract sort of pattern that is very
appealing. There are no details, no bodies.


readability="7">

There were a thousand shades of
gray,
with colors--some blue perhaps and maybe green--
trying to
assert themselves against that
gray.



For a brief time, it
does not look like a massive graveyard of humanity. But then the sun comes up, and the
burial detail is clearly able to see what they have done: there is no doubt at the end.
These are the vestiges of war. And if by some miracle there is a moment when the
battered and lonely dead disappear, it is an answer to prayer, but only a brief
one...for the burial detail.


This story was written by
Andrew L. Hudgins, Jr.:


readability="8.4230769230769">

His next book [was] After
the Lost War: A Narrative
(1988), [which] explores the post-bellum South
entirely through poet  href="http://www.encyclopediaofalabama.org/face/Article.jsp?id=h-2907">Sidney
Lanier's voice, following the Confederate soldier and poet from the first
years of the war to his
death.



Using Lanier's voice,
Hudgins explores the Civil War through the eyes of a long-dead member of the Confederate
army (and poet). The topics of Lanier and Alabama brought to Hudgins "equal parts
respect and bewilderment."

In Macbeth, what was life in Scotland like under Macbeth's reign?

There is no doubt as to Malcolm's and Macduff's revulsion
for the usurper of Scotland. At the very outset of the scene, Macduff enthuses Malcolm
to take up arms and defend his inheritance and birthright. Macduff is outraged to see 
dead bodies of young men: widows and orphaned children bereft and grieving the loss of
loved ones. Their screams of agony rending the air and reverberating to the heavens
themselves.


Initially, we sense caution in Malcolm as to
his relationship with Macduff. He is suspicious of Macduff because he openly tells
Macduff that he has been a close friend of the tyrant and a favourite. His assumption is
that Macduff might have arrived in England only to lure the "poor, innocent lamb" into
the traitor's snare. He's of the opinion that Macduff may stand to gain by betraying
him. He quotes the example of Lucifer, who'd been God's favourite angel and yet was
thrown down from heaven because of his rebellious nature. He hints that Macduff too
could fall from grace and turn traitor.


There is no doubt
that Malcolm feels uneasy in casting aspersion on Macduff, but, that is only to protect
himself from being ensnared. He tells Macduff that he must not think of his suspicion as
dishonour to himself, for he may be quite honourable despite what he thinks of
him.


Macduff is appalled and visualizes the end of
Scotland, since its heir and successor, has lost faith even in those men who are loyal
to him. He grieves and says that Scotland will continue to bleed and there will be no
retribution for the evil and the wicked because "goodness dare not check
thee".


Malcolm is aware that Scotland is doomed and each
new day sees a fresh wound inflicted upon it. He knows that the tyranny and oppression
that Macbeth has unleashed upon its hapless people will not cease unless a greater power
is set forth toward Scotland to cower the brute and bring him to his
knees.

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Explain: "O, I have bought the mansion of love..." UNTIL "... And may not wear them".

Key point to remember here:


*
That very morning, Romeo and Juliet were married (quickly).  Then, Romeo ran off and got
in the huge street brawl.  Meanwhile, Juliet (the virgin) is back at home waiting for
her wedding night... thinking that due to her husband's rashness, may not in fact happen
now.


"Bought the mansion of a love but not possessed it," =
married legally but not carnally.


"sold, not enjoyed." =
what have I got out of this marriage yet?


"impatient child
that hath new robes and may not wear them..." = like, I've been waiting my entire life
for this moment, and now, it is HERE (I have the "clothes" to celebrate) and I won't get
to because my husband just murdered my cousin... and all I wanted was a honeymoon.  Is
that so much to ask?

Saturday, December 24, 2011

Why doesn't Mayella confess the truth? Consider the circumstances of her life and the social context in which she must continue to live.this was in...

Think about the racial dynamics of those days and think
about what her father is like...


One of the reasons that
Tom is in so much trouble is that black men and white women are not supposed to have
anything to do with each other in that time and place.  So if Mayella has been
voluntarily doing something even a bit physical with a black man, she will be totally
scorned and shunned by other whites.


In addition, her dad
is a pretty violent man.  If he feels like she has humiliated him, he will surely beat
her.

What does the author say about the characters and their significance in the story? Use quotes and examples.

We learn a lot about Curley's wife based on what other
characters say of her. Thus, I agree with dstuva, the author doesn't make value
statements but let's the characters display that.


The men
call her a tart and a loo-loo. Not being common slang today, we infer by their use of
these terms that they mean she is flirty, flighty and maybe a little permiscuous. Yet,
her name, Curley's wife, suggests she is actually property. Always seeming to look for
Curley, the men seem to wonder if she's not really either looking for Slim or looking
for a man to be with other than Curley. This is a character I believe looking for an
escape from her current life.


Another way characterization
occurs besides other characters saying something about someone else is from a character
saying something directly about themselves. Curley's wife admits in chapter 4 that she
feels limited by Curley. In chapter 5 she explains that she could have been in
pictures.


Curley's wife symbolizes the desire to be free
from current situations. That is her significance.

Friday, December 23, 2011

Find the perimeter of the triangle whose sides are (1,2) , (3,4) and (-1,5)

Given the perimeter whose edges are the point A(1,2),
B(3,4) and C(-1,5)


We need to find the perimeter of the
triangle.


First we need to find the length of the
sides


==> We will use the distance between two
points formula to calculate the length of the
sides.


==> AB = sqrt( 3-1)^2 + (4-2)^2 = sqrt(8) =
2sqrt2


==> BC = sqrt(3+1)^2 + (4-5)^2 =
sqrt(17)


==> AC = sqrt(1+1)^2+(2-5)^2 =
sqrt(13)


Then the perimeter
is:


P = AB + BC +
AC


  = 2sqrt2 + sqrt17 +
sqrt13


= 2.83 + 4.12 + 3.61 =
10.56 ( approx.)

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Chaucer describes the Knight, Friar, Merchant, and Wife of Bath as worthy.What are the varying senses of worthiness that the characters...

In Chaucer's Prologue to The Canterbury
Tales
, Chaucer provides the reader with a variety of insights into these
characters of diverse backgrounds: from the very wealthy to the poor and
humble.


In this case, we will look at Chaucer's
descriptions of the Knight, Friar, Merchant and Wife of
Bath.


The Knight and the Wife of Bath are
truly worthy.


The Knight is a man who
has fought for king and country. He has returned from war, and his first thought is to
go on this holy pilgrimage to thank God for sparing his life. Beneath his armor we see
that the clothing he wears to protect his skin is marred with wear and tear associated
with battle, and the condition of his clothes attests to how hard he
works.


readability="15">

...from the day on which he first began / To
ride abroad had followed chivalry, / Truth, honor, generousness and courtesy...He was of
sovereign value in all eyes., / And though so much distinguished, he was wise / And in
his bearing as modest as a maid. / He never yet a boorish thing had said / In all his
life to any, come what might; / He was a true, a perfect
gentle-knight.



Chaucer points
out that the Knight does not just say the right things, but the proof of his sterling
character can be found in what he does.


The Wife of Bath is
a totally different kind of person. She is bawdy (tells jokes and sings songs that are
inappropriate for a woman), but she is a good person at heart. This is one of several
holy pilgrimages she has made. She has had five husbands and is looking for another. She
supports marriage and enjoys it. She is a successful merchant of fabrics, has a very
upbeat personality, and while she is larger than life, her heart is good. She is
desirous of a sixth marriage, for she is a woman who enjoys sex, but only in the
confines of marriage.


The Merchant's description is a brief
one. He is dressed very nicely. He is solemn in his demeanor, wishes trade lanes were
protected against pirates. He is an expert with all things related to money, however he
has also learned to hide the true secret of his financial
situation:


readability="10">

This estimable Merchant so had set / His wits to
work, none knew he was in debt, / He was so stately in negotiation, / Loan, bargain and
commercial obligation.



The
Merchant does not let the world see the truth about him—he pretends to be wealthy and
implies he is knowledgeable and successful, but he is in debt. He helps no one: having
money and keeping it is everything. He is unworthy.


The
Friar (unworthy) represents those of the Church's clergy who Chaucer believes have
stopped serving God. The truth is that the Friar fools around with the young girls and
then arranges marriages for them. He will hear a sinner's confession—but for a
price.


He is a Limiter, a begging friar, but he makes more
than a beggar. The more people give him, the more he forgives them. He is more familiar
with bars and barmaids, than the poor he is supposed to serve:
lepers, beggars, etc. Rather than praying, people should give him silver. For the woman
without shoes, he take her last coin. He settles arguments for a fee. He has time for
the rich if they can help him, but no time for those who suffer in his
parish.


While the Knight and the Wife of Bath are honest
and admired by Chaucer, the worthiness he ascribes to the last two characters is ironic:
he may say that they are well-versed in what they do, but they are
not honest people. They do only for themselves. Reading between the lines exposes
Chaucer's true feelings.

What is A.E. Housman's attitude towards life as seen in his poem "Loveliest of Trees"?

In this poem, Housman shows a "carpe diem" attitude
towards life.  He realizes that life is short and, because of that, he believes that we
should try to live life to the fullest.  We should go out and enjoy everything life has
to offer because life will end too soon (even if we live to an old
age).


In the poem, Housman uses the idea of looking at
cherry blossoms to stand in for experiencing everything life has to offer.  He talks
about how even fifty more years of life is not enough to "look at things in bloom" --
that is, to do all the things that he would like to do.  Therefore, he says, he will go
out and do as much as he can.


As this shows, Housman's
attitude towards life in this poem is that life is short and that people should,
therefore, grab it with both hands and enjoy it while they can.

What is the contrast between Poe's "Tell-Tale Heart and Woolf's "A Haunted House"?

In comparing Edgar Allan Poe's story, "The Tell-Tale
Heart," and Virginia Woolf's "A Haunted House," the mood of the stories is strikingly
different.


In Poe's tale of horror, "The Tell-Tale Heart,"
the narrator is insane, though he insists repeatedly that he is not. His insanity drives
him to murder the old man with the "Evil Eye" who lives with him, simply because he
feels the man's eye is a curse on him. The narrator then conceals the body beneath the
floor boards in the house. As his psychosis increases, he imagines he hears the beating
of the old man's heart. His madness finally takes over as the murderer reveals to
investigating police what he has done, as he cannot bear to listen to what he imagines
to be the beating of the dead man's heart.


By comparison,
Virginia Woolf's "A Haunted House" is a very different kind of tale. It is a ghost
story, but there is no horror here. In fact, if anything, the mood of the story revolves
around love. The house is haunted by a husband and wife who very much loved each other
in life. Now as they haunt the house where they lived, they open and close doors and
move things, but never harm the couple that lives there now. The ghosts are looking for
something, and as is the case with Poe's story, there is a "pulse," but this is the
house that is like a living thing, and the pulse quickens as they draw closer to
discovering what they seek.


By the end of the story, the
treasure they seek is the love they shared in life: to find it in someone else. As the
ghosts visit the narrator and her husband as they sleep, the narrator awakens, and in a
moment's time, she realizes that the treasure the dead couple seeks is what resides in
the hearts of the narrator and her husband: it is "the light in the
heart."


Whereas Poe's story is based on the insanity of a
murderer, Woolf's story is based upon loving ghosts who wish to find the love
they had shared, with others who have found that same treasure
themselves.

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

What other names are given to Napoleon in chapter 8? What do these titles suggest about his character?

Napoleon is called by all sorts of names that make him
sound really good.  The book lists some of them.  Here is the quote where you can find
some of these names.


readability="13">

He was always referred to in formal style as
‘our Leader, Comrade Napoleon,’ and this pigs liked to invent for him such titles as
Father of All Animals, Terror of Mankind, Protector of the Sheep-fold, Ducklings'
Friend, and the like



To me,
what this shows is that Napoleon is totally drunk on his own power.  He is starting to
try to put together a "cult of personality" where the whole society is based on revering
him.


So he must have a huge ego and he must really want
everyone to think that he is the next thing to a god.

Please comment in detail about the immorality and hypocrisy of Mr.Wickham in the novel Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen.Please reply soon !

Wickham's name is no coincidence for he is, indeed,
"wicked".


As Darcy explains to
Elizabeth,


readability="10">

Mr. Wickham is the son of a very respectable man
who had for many years the management of all the Pemberly estates; and whose good
conduct in the discharge of this trust naturally inclined my father to be of service to
him; and on George Wickham, who was his god-son, his kindness was therefore liberally
bestowed.



We know that
Wickham was supported by Darcy's father to even attend college at Cambridge. However,
all it did for him was make him a master of illusions, and a deceitful traitor with the
charm and manners that could fool everyone.


Ad the death of
Mr. Darcy (the father) Wickham's true colors came out. He refused to take on any
profession of which Mr. Darcy Senior would have liked, and he demanded that Mr. Darcy
(the son) would support him monetarily in the pursue of other goals. This, he did with
premeditation and haughtiness, using the affection that Old Mr. Darcy had for him as a
way to shove it to  the Young Darcy, who always figured as
much.


On top of it, Wickham proposed himself to Darcy's
sister Georgiana, and they eloped. Using the same charm and wit, he convinced her of a
lot of follies, and she fell for it only to be saved in reputation later by young
Darcy.


In addition to that, he did the same thing with
Elizabeth's sister Lydia. Lydia, who already was the closest thing to a bubble head, was
infatuated with men in uniform and with the idea of marriage. Wickham proposed that they
also eloped, which she did, ruining her reputation and their chances in society. Darcy
intervened one more time by finding them in Brighton and marrying them off, which
allowed Lydia to return with her head held high (and very snobby
too).


The biggest prroblem with Wickham is that he poses to
be, as Elizabeth says, "the most agreeable man" when, in fact, he is deceitful,
ambitious, immoral, and careless. He did not love any of the women he eloped with, and
his effrontery as a military officer was just a way to attract people into thinking that
he was an honorable man.

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

In Book 14 of The Odyssey, why doesn't Odysseus reveal himself to Eumaeus when the swineherd gives ample evidence of his loyalty?

This is a great question. You might find you get a range
of answers, but my own idea is that we see in this section of The
Odyssey
an Odysseus who displays his customary flair for storytelling. It is
as if he loves to weave stories for other people. It is important to note that although,
strictly, the story that he tells Eumaeus is a "lie," actually, Odysseus incorporates
many actual adventures into this "lie," making it a strange commingling of truth and
fiction. Of couse, we must remember too, that Odysseus is returning to his kingdom after
a massive length of time away from his wife and his people, and so we can understand why
he is very wary about being honest and revealing himself, even to the most loyal of his
subjects such as Eumaeus. You always get the sense, though, that Odysseus loves telling
stories so much that he gets somewhat carried away. He could have revealed himself, as
you say, but delights in testing, and telling stories, so much, that he
delays.

Find the area bounded by y=8-x^2 and y=x^2.

First, we'll have to identify the limits of integration.
For this rason, we'll determine the intercepting points of the
graphs.


Since y = x^2 and y = 8-x^2, we'll
get:


x^2 = 8-x^2


We'll move
all terms to one side:


x^2 - 8 + x^2 =
0


2x^2 - 8 = 0


We'll divide by
2:


x^2 - 4 = 0


x^2 =
4


x1 = 2 and x2 = -2


Over the
interval [-2 ; 2] the graph 8-x^2 >= x^2


The area of
the region is the definite integral of the function 8 - x^2 - x^2, for x = -2 to x =
2.


A = Int (8 - x^2 - x^2)dx


A
= Int (8 - 2x^2)dx


A = Int 8dx -  Int
2x^2dx


A = 8x - 2x^3/3, for x = -2 to x =
2


A = 8(2 + 2) - (2/3)(8 +
8)


A = 32 - 32/3


A =
(96-32)/3


A = 64/3 square
units.


The area is A =  64/3 square
units.

What is the plot of "Soldier's Home"?

The plot of "Soldier’s Home" involves Krebs as the
protagonist in conflict with the abstract antagonism of peacetime adjustment. Obviously,
those around him expect him to be the little boy he was, and to be unchanged by the war.
They therefore assume that he can begin life again as though nothing has happened. The
crisis of the story is his conversation with his mother, and the climax is his promise
to be a good boy for his "Mummy" (paragraph 86). This portion of the story indicates
that his disaffection is approaching total alienation. The resolution, in his decision
to go to Kansas City and in his going to watch his sister play ball, suggests a
compromise with his disaffection. Though he will continue to feel like an outsider, in
other words, he will keep his misgivings to himself, and will fit in, at least
externally, with life at home.

Monday, December 19, 2011

What is the significance of Italy's invasion of Libya and Greece?

Well, to clarify, Libya was already an Italian colony at
the beginning of World War II, so Italy didn't need to invade it.  You may be thinking
of Ethiopia, which Mussolini attacked in 1936.  While he was successful at conquering
this poor, ill-equipped nation, it demonstrated that his army was no
juggernaut.


He fared even worse in Greece, where a massive
Italian attack was stopped by a few understrength divisions of the Greek Army.  For six
months, Mussolini's forces failed to gain the upper hand.  He called his friend Hitler,
who agreed to help him out by invading both Yugoslavia and Greece in "Operation
Punishment".  German forces conquered both nations in a mere seven
days.


This operation delayed the attack on the Soviet Union
by five weeks, which would become crucial the following December, when German troops
stalled right outside of Moscow as winter set in.  If they had attacked in early May
instead, as planned, they likely would have taken the city.

What are the solutions of the equation: cos x + cos 3x = 0?

We'll transform the sum in product using the
formula:


cos a + cos b = 2 cos[(a+b)/2]cos
[(a-b)/2]


We'll write the formula for a = x and b =
3x:


cos x + cos 3x = 2cos[(x+3x)/2]cos
[(x-3x)/2]


cos x + cos 3x = 2cos[(4x)/2]cos
[(-2x)/2]


cos x + cos 3x = 2cos[(2x)]cos
[(-x)]


Since the function cosine is even, we'll write cos
[(-x)] = cos x.


cos x + cos 3x = 2cos 2x*cos
x


We'll put 2cos 2x*cos x =
0


cos 2x = 0


2x = +/- arccos 0
+ 2kpi


2x = +/-pi/2 +
2kpi


x = +/- pi/4 +
kpi


cos x =
0


x = +/- pi/2 +
2kpi


The solutions of the
equation are: {+/- pi/4 + kpi}U{+/- pi/2 + 2kpi}.

Sunday, December 18, 2011

Why have the Democratic and Republican parties been so durable so as to maintain exsistence since the Civil War? Explain.

I think pohnpei's response is right on.  Ours has been
designed as a two party system, first by the Founding Fathers in order to avoid what
Washington called "The dangers of faction".  Since that time, the two party system
supports and continues itself, making it very difficult for other interested parties to
enter the race.


We should acknowledge that there are many
more than two parties in the US today.  The Green Party, Socialist Party, Communist
Party and Reform Party to name a few.  These parties always put up candidates for the
Presidency, and always lose badly.  They are not even allowed to attend
debates.


The Democrat and Republican parties have loads of
cash, name recognition, a base of support, and a hammerlock on power.  They also try to
absorb other political movements and would-be parties by including some of the issues
important to them in their party "platforms" adopted at the national
conventions.

What are the literary devices used in the poem "The Masked Face" by Thomas Hardy?I want to know all the literary devices used in this poem such as...

Although this poem contains no examples of similes,
metaphors and personification, you would do well to pay attention to the other sound
effects that Hardy uses in this poem. Chief among these is alliteration, which appears a
number of times in this short poem. Consider the following examples and what the
alliteration does to the description. Firstly, the first line begins: "I found in me a
great surging space..." Note how the alliteration in the "s" sound helps emphasise the
size and bewildering state of this space that the speaker finds within himself.
Secondly, the speaker says that this space has no "firm-fixed floor," which again
emphasises the disturbing nature of this environment. Consider how the repetition of the
"f" sound is used again in the second stanza, as the doors are described as "fast
locked, and fill with fear." The "f" sound here seems to help convey the fear of the
narrator when confronted with these portals that entrap him in this "giddying
space."


Lastly, and key to the meaning of the poem, the
masked face uses an analogy in the last stanza that effectively compares our life and
the way we often complain about our situation to a pen that complains about what it is
being used to write because it doesn't understand
it.


Therefore, although this poem is absent of figurative
language such as similes and personification, there are ample examples of alliteration
that help convey the mood of fear and bewilderment of the speaker and also an analogy
which is used to convey the theme of the poem.

A parallelogram is formed in R^3 by the vectors PA=(3, 2, -3) and PB=(4, 1, 5). The point P=(0, 2, 3)Find the area of the parallelogram.

One side of the parallelogram is the vector PA and another
is PB. Let the fourth vertex be C.


The vertex A is (0, 2,
3) + (3, 2, -3) = (3, 4, 0)


The vertex B is (0, 2, 3) + (4,
1, 5) = (4, 3, 8)


The fourth vertex C is A + PB = (7, 5,
5)


Now, the diagonals of the parallelogram
are:


AB = (3, 4, 0) - (4, 3, 8) = (-1, 1, -8). |AB| = sqrt
(1+1+64) = sqrt(66)


PC = (7, 5, 5) - (0, 2, 3) = (7, 3, 2),
|PQ| = sqrt(49+9+4) = sqrt(62)


Let the angle APB be equal
to x, this gives:


|AB|^2 = |PA|^2 + |PB|^2 - 2 |PA| |PB|
cos x


=> 66 = 22 + 42 - 2*sqrt(22*42)*cos
x


=> cos x =
1/sqrt(22*42)


=> sin x = sqrt ( 1 - 1/(sqrt 22*42)^2
)


=> sin x = sqrt (22*42 -
1)/sqrt(22*42)


Taking an altitude from vertex A for the
triangle PAB, we have


h = |PA| sin x = sqrt(22) sqrt
(22*42-1) / sqrt(22*42)


The area of the triangle is
(1/2)*|PB|*h. The parallelogram is twice this area or the required area
is:


2*(1/2)*|PB|*h


=>
sqrt(42)*sqrt(22)*sqrt (22*42 - 1)/sqrt(22*42)


=>
sqrt(22*42 - 1)


=>
sqrt(923)


=>30.38


The
required area of the parallelogram is 30.38

Saturday, December 17, 2011

In what ways does Sassoon use irony to express his anger through his poem "The Hero"?

Sassoon's "The Hero" focuses on anger, irony of situation,
and hypocrisy.   


Specifically, concerning anger, the
"Brother Officer" is angry at Jack, a "cold-footed, useless swine."  But on a larger
level, the poem reveals anger at a system that perpetuates
war. 


A boy goes to war.  He is scared to death and does
not represent himself or his country well.  He is blown to bits.  A Colonel writes a
letter to the mother of the soldier, "so nicely."  A fellow soldier goes to his mother
and lies about how brave he was.  The mother is gullible and falls for the nicely
written letter and the lies of the fellow soldier.  The fellow soldier is left
regretting what he's done.


The characters are all in no-win
situations, ironical situations.  None of the characters, with the possible exception of
Jack, can be easily blamed for what they do.  The Colonel and the Fellow Officer
certainly can't tell the mother the truth about her cowardly son.  The mother can't help
but want to believe her son was brave and died nobly.


Yet,
all of them are to be blamed for perpetuating the war machine.  The mother, for
instance, falls for the letter partly because of how nicely it is written.  Those are
her first words after she reads it.  She bows her head because she is choking up and is
embarrassed and hurt, not because she doesn't believe what the Colonel and Fellow
Soldier say.  She believes it and is emotionally
moved. 


The Colonel and the Fellow soldier perpetuate the
myth of a close-knit military that cares for its own, of bravery and valor and heroism. 
When the truth is:


readability="12">

...how, at last, he
died,


Blown to small bits.  And no one seemed to
care


Except that lonely woman with white
hair.



Irony
abounds:


  • the Colonel and Fellow Soldier don't
    tell the truth to the grieving mother

  • the mother believes
    the fabricated version of her son's military service, she believes what she wants to
    believe

  • this is seemingly how it has to be, at least from
    the military standpoint

  • yet this perpetuates the war
    machine, when telling the truth might help the public understand the truth about war and
    therefore make them less likely to support it

  • therefore,
    politeness and consideration, if you give the Colonel and the Fellow Officer the benefit
    of the doubt, actually lead to destruction and
    despair.

Friday, December 16, 2011

In The Scarlet Letter, why does Hester go to the Governor's house?

Hester has heard that the Governor is thinking about
taking Pearl away from her. She goes in order to argue against this idea. The idea is
that Pearl is getting a little out of control and could likely use a little better
supervision. There is notice in Pearl that some evil spiritual activity might be at
work. Perhaps this is evidence of the father according to the magistrates who discuss
these circumstances. The concern of witchcraft is never fully determined. The ultimate
decision is to let Pearl stay with Hester. Thus, Hester's pleas and Dimmsdale's support
helped ensure that she keep her child.


On a side note,
Hester did bring the governor some gloves that she had embroidered for
him.

What is the effect of having a mannequin with you as you train for CPR?How is having a mannequin more helpful than watching a video on CPR?

I think that the practical aspect is vitally important in
CPR Training.  It's not akin to watching a food preparation video, where mistakes could
be remedied "next time out."  Rather, in CPR training, time is essential.  It is vitally
important to "get it right" in terms of technique and approach.  The mannequin is
important in this in that individuals can apply the ideas of how to render CPR in an
exact manner.  The more times one practices with the mannequin, the greater the chance
that when placed in that specific situation, one is not overcome with the magnitude of
the moment.  I think that in solely studying the video, there is a certain "newness"
that is evident in situations where the mannequin has not been used.  The placement of
mouth for breath, the hands for compressions, as well assessing the situation from the
outset are elements that can be practiced in a more "real" sense with the mannequin.  In
being able to match up what is happening in the video or with pictures along with an
actual mannequin to practically demonstrate, there is a greater effectiveness in
instruction.

Thursday, December 15, 2011

What is ironic about the fact that Farquhar agrees with the saying that, "all is fair in love and war?""An Occurrence at Owl Bridge" by Ambrose Bierce

In Ambrose Bierce's "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge,"
the irony of the statement to which Farquhar agrees, "all is fair in love and war" is
situational irony.  That is, there is discrepancy between what is expected to happen on
Farquahar's part, and what actually happens.


Thinking that
he is justified in performing whatever service he can in aid of the South, Farquhar
learns from a soldier dressed in grey that the bridge has driftwood now that is dry and
"would burn like tow." In addition to the irony of the soldier being in reality a
Federal scout, the situational irony is that Farquar sets out to burn the bridge when in
actuality it is the bridge that effects his own death:  "A man stood upon a railroad
bridge....the two private soldiers stepped aside and each drew away the plank upon which
he had been standing."  


Farquhar's being hanged on the
bridge which he has intended to burn makes even the choice of words
used by Bierce to describe the phase "all is fair in love and war" ironic.  For, Bierce
writes that the phase is a "frankly villainous dictum."  Obviously, nothing is fair in
love and war.  And, it is here that the central irony of Bierce's story lies.  For,
Peyton Farquhar is the butt of the satire in this story and not the sympathetic hero
that he first seems. As the story unfolds, Bierce develops the "frankly villainous"
nature of war as he contrasts it with Farquar's romanticized, unrealistic view
of "gallant army," "larger life of the soldier," "opportunity for distinction," and "no
adventure too perilous."


Farquar's imagined escape, too, is
ironic as it is a "civilian's dream of war," as well:


readability="14">

'If I could free my hands,' he thought, 'I might
throw off the noose and spring into the stream,  By diving I could evade the bullets
and, swimming vigorously, reach the bank, take to the woods, and get
home.'



The knowledge of war
that Peyton Farquhar has is that of books, not reality.  In fact, his imaginings are
described by one critic as "Walter-Mitty like."  Even his name is ironic: 
Peyton derives from the Scottish Payton, a
form of Patrick, which means of noble birth;
Farquhar derives from the Gaelic Fearachar,
meaning manly or brave.  Clearly, Bierce's theme of the less than glorious condition of
war comes through with all the ironic elements of his story.

How does Prospero have control over Caliban?

Prospero has clearly got some control over Caliban.
However the extent of control is substantially lower than you would have thought.  In
act 1 scene 2, Miranda and Prospero visit Caliban. Miranda obviously doesn’t care about
control over him, “I do not love to look on,” all she wants is too stay away from him.
This is not her only vain moment in the play. Prospero however makes a great show of how
much power he has, how he can punish Caliban, yet Caliban is completely used to this
form of abusive behaviour that he replies with a non-sequitur. He is obviously immune to
his punishments by now.  That shows that he just ignores Prospero most of the time, and
doesn’t see him as a threat. However Prospero can control some aspects of Calibans life.
He controls where Caliban lives, what Caliban does, and where he is allowed to go.
Prospero cannot control what Caliban says to him. Prospero taught him their language, so
Caliban must have heard it from Prospero first.  In conclusion, Prospero controls
Caliban in the only way he knows how, with magic.

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

What did Union troops have on their uniforms?

At the very beginning of the war most Federal uniforms
were "frock coats." These were knee-length, somewhat styledcoats that were lined and way
too hot for summer usage. Other than insignia of rank, according to military
specifications, brass insignia was mostly on the leather goods associated with the
uniform. A cartridge box with a leather strap was hanging from the left shoulder, across
the chest, and resting on the right hip. This was kept in place by a leather belt. On
the cartridge box as a shiny brass oval with the letters US on it (for the regular army,
that is). On the front of the strap that crossed the chest was another shiny brass
circle with an eagle on it. As a belt buckle was another shiny brass oval with the
letters US on it. On the head gear would be a Jaegar horn (hunter's horn - a curved horn
which symbolized that the wearer hunted down the enemies of his country) along with a
brass letter and a brass number. These represented company and
regiment.


It didn't take too long for the soldier to
realize all this brass reflected the sunlight pretty well and created easier targets for
the enemy to shoot at. Thyerefore, as much of this stuff was removed as they could get
away with. Also, the stylish frock coat was soon replaced by a very common sack coat
which came in four sizes; size 1, 2, 3, and 4.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

What is the plot of Twelfth Night?

Twelfth Night is a story about transgression. Shakespeare
plays with the themes of love, mistaken identity, and social class in this comedy. The
play actually contains three plotlines that come together in the final scene.  The
plotlines are held together by the character of Feste, the Fool, who can cross social
boundaries because of his exemption from behaving, the right of an "allowed Fool." The
plotlines are as follows:


1. Viola, stranded on Illyria
after a shipwreck and the loss of her twin Sebastian, is forced by her status as a
single, unaccompanied woman, to disguise herself as a boy and work at Orsino's court.
There she falls in love with Orsino but cannot reveal herself because of her deception.
Orsino is in love with the Lady Olivia, who has also recently lost a brother. He sends
Viola, in her disguise as the page Cesario, to woo Olivia. Olivia then falls in love
with Cesario, unaware that "he" is "she."


2. Sebastian did
not drown, but was saved by Antonio, who cares for him. He, too, is in Illyria, but does
not know that his sister is alive. He and Antonio must part ways since Antonio is
Orsino's enemy, but he does not want to leave Sebastian and follows
him.


3. Toby, Olivia's relative, has brought Andrew, a
"foolish knight" to woo her in hopes of being the financial beneficiary of their union.
They are continually in trouble for drinking and partying at all hours in Olivia's house
with the help of Maria, Olivia's gentlewoman.  The steward Malvolio, who has delusions
of marrying Olivia himself, threatens to expose them and they devise a plot to undo him,
sending him to Olivia under the pretense that she has written him a
letter.


Of course, all the characters finally come together
and are unmasked at the end of the play. Orsino gets Viola; Sebastian gets Olivia, and
Maria marries Sir Toby.

What is China's interest in occupying Tibet?

I would say the one of the primary reasons China occupied
Tibet in the first place was to display to the World the superiority of the newly
created communist regime that had come into power. One has to remember that China broke
all prior treaties which had been created between the rulers of Tibet and those of China
after the communists defeated the nationalists and won the civil war that had started in
China, in 1950.


The reasons for the continuation of Chinese
occupation include the discovery of large deposits of natural resources in Tibet which
include copper, lead, zinc, etc.


The glaciers in Tibet also
form a large resource of water which is essential for China and also acts as a leverage
against India, the largest rival of China. Some of India's most important rivers
originate in the glaciers of Tibet.

What does the word Howl mean when Parris says They Will Howl Me Out Of Salem?

It is important to remember a few details about this
quote. One, at what point of the play does he say this ( the context of the quote)? The
other, why does playwright Arthur Miller choose the word "howl" to characterize Parris
in this line?


one:


The quote
is referring to Parris' response to Thomas' comment of the possibility of  being accused
of having witchcraft in his house. Parris lives in constant fear of his community.  He
does not trust his
parish.


Two:


Remember that in
plays the characters are developed through the words they speak. They are carefully
chosen by the playwright for that reason.


So, let's look at
the word howl. The definiton of "howling" is an sound/action of a group of wild dogs
often heard at night after a successful hunt. The connotation ( shade of emotional
meaning) is more powerful when the word spoken gives the audience perspectives that a
character is feeling.


Parris is a fearful character who is
constantly sucked in by the antics and hysteria of others. Parris' use of "howl"
illustrates his attitude toward the "pack of wild dogs" that is his community. The use
of  language is Miller's way of illustrating Parris as a character and reveals how
Parris feels about the other members of his community.


If
Parris would have said "they will run me out of town" it would not have the same
imagery.  "Howl" is a  derogatory (  put down) in reference to members of his community.
Parris obviously does not respect the people he serves: he thinks of them as wild dogs
that will hunt him down if given a reason.

What is the role of poet according to emerson with reference to essay, ''poet", discuss.what are the functions of a true poet addvocated by emerson?

The poet, according to Emerson, has to be just about
everything. 


He has to be a seer into the soul of man, he
must be an interpreter and a
prophet.



 I
know not how it is that we need an interpreter; but the great majority of men seem to be
minors, who have not yet come into possession of their own, or mutes, who cannot report
the conversation they have had with
nature. 



Mankind may see
things about them in their world, but so very few ever put into words a great expression
that impacts, that influences, that makes value of the every day mundane to all other
men. This is the power of a poet that interprets.


The poet
must be a foreteller, a
prophet:


readability="9">

The sign and credentials of the poet are, that he
announces that which no man foretold. He is the true and only doctor; he knows and
tells; he is the only teller of news, for he was present and privy to the appearance
which he describes.



The poet
must have the ability to color and accompany life. This is
the difference between watching television in black and white or on an HD LCD screen in
living color. This is the difference between a tinny cheap radio and a live
orchestra.



We
hear, through all the varied music, the ground-tone of conventional life. Our poets are
men of talents who
sing.



Poets must have
imagination, and they must have energy.

Monday, December 12, 2011

Bring out the comparison between the world and the stage in the soliloquy of Jaques in As You Like It.

This important and incredibly famous soliloquy is
delivered in Act II scene 7 in this play. In this soliloquy, Jacques compares the world
to a stage, and the people that inhabit that world to players who act out a role on the
stage and play many different characters during their
lifetime:



All
the world's a stage,
And all the men and women merely players;
They
have their exits and their entrances,
And one man in his time plays many
parts,
His acts being seven
ages.



The more you think
about this extended metaphor, the more truth we see in it as we recognise that way in
which our lives are "acted out" in front of audiences. We do indeed all have our "exits
and entrances," and as the soliloquy goes on to demonstrate, we all play different roles
during our lifespan. As Jaques goes on to describe these "seven ages," we are forced to
see how our role changes and develops as we grow older, until we reach the seventh age,
with the rather terrifying image of being left with "second childness" and "mere
oblivion." And on this age, the curtain falls on our life.

Analyze William Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily" in chronological order.

Reassembling William Faulkner's short story, "A Rose for
Emily," is no easy task since it is told in a manner that includes multiple shifts in
time. Chronologically, we first hear of Emily in her 20s, "a slender figure" pictured
with her father in a photograph. Emily's father died while she was in her 30s, and she
refused to allow the body to be removed from the house for three days. "She was sick for
a long time" after that, and when she next appeared her hair had been cut short. She met
Homer Barron soon after. Their romance was a short one. Some of Emily's relatives
visited to discuss her relationship with this Yankee working man. After the relatives
left, Homer reappeared, but soon he was gone--but not before Emily had made an unusual
purchase of rat poison. Not long after, a smell was noticed about the Grierson house,
and some townspeople soon spread lime around the outer fringes of the home to eradicate
the smell. Soon, it, too, was gone.


It was a long time
before Emily was seen again, and her hair was turning gray. She gave china painting
lessons for "six or seven years, when she was about forty." Soon after, she was greeted
by a delegation to inquire about her taxes, which she refused to pay. After the children
stopped coming for the painting lessons, Emily was rarely visible. Only her manservant,
Tobe, was seen, except for an occasional glimpse of her sitting in a downstairs chair.
She died at the age of 74.


Following her death, Tobe
disappeared. The funeral was held "on the second day" afterward and was attended by
several of her cousins and men in Confederate uniforms. After Emily "was decently in the
ground," a group of men arrived to inspect the old house. They found the upstairs
bedroom locked. When they broke the door down, they found the skeletal remains of a
man in the bed with a yellowed pillow beside his skull: It had the indentation of a head
and on it lay a single iron-gray hair.  

Sunday, December 11, 2011

How Does Jem change?? And What does Scout learn about Calpurnia?

i think what jem went through is more than just physical
growth.


1) he was able to see the bigger picture to
situations when he told atticus that dill had runaway from hom- "broke the remaining
code of our childhood." because he understood



that his parents would be very
worried.



2) jem learns that it is pride, not
pain (a kind of "manly thought")and begins to treasure
relationships.


he goes back to retrieve his pants even
though he could have lost his life - nathan radley said he would shoot if he saw anyone
in his collard patch. even scout discourages him- "a lickin' hurts but it doesn't last."
yet, he knows that atticus would be dissapointed in him and he didn't want this to
happen. "atticus ain't ever whipped me as along as i can remember and i want to keep it
that way." this shows that to gain apprival from atticus, he is even willing to lose his
life.appreactiation of relationships can also be seen when he cries when nathan radley
sealed up the knothole. "i saw that he had been crying."


3)
jem learns that things are not in black and white but in shades of grey and that people
are not as pleasant as they seem.


he saw people as
segreggated as he grew older- "four kinds of folks in the world", "Why do they go out of
their way an' despise each other?" he felt like he was a "caterpillar in a cocoon"- he
had never knew these harsh facts of life.


4) jem learns to
sympathise and empathise


roly poly bug- he told scout
"don't do that" when she tried to squish it.


boo radley-
"maybe he doesn't want to come out......"


he is more
sensitive to the defenceless.



as for scout and
calpurnia,


1) scout learns that cal can bring herself down
to the level of others when required because "folks don't like it" when you try to "put
on airs to beat moses." she is a sensitive character and a respectable one as
well.



hope it helped! i was trying to do my own
revision too.  (:

Saturday, December 10, 2011

What is the point of view in the novel and how does it affect the book and why?

In The Catcher in the Rye, the
point-of-view is first person flashback told in "sweet style" teenage vernacular
arranged in an episodic structure to show a humorous and rebellious tone.  The narration
also adds psychological depth of an alienated narrator caught in an unjust society.  The
last two points below (K. & L.) are key.


Here are
the nuts and bolts from my lecture notes:


I.
Narration


A.
Bildungsroman: novel of maturation


B. Coming-of-Age
(apprenticeship novel)


C. Bookend structure: framed in
California; story proper is Penn., NYC


D. Holden’s voice is
implicitly male voice


E. American
voice


F. Folksy voice


G.
Youthful, teenage voice with adult voice behind it


1.
conversational style


2. simple
language


3. colloquial
(slang)


4. lots of
repetition


5. cussing


6. many
digressions


H. Holden is unreliable
narrator


I. Confession (“If you really want to hear about
it…)


1. to a
psychiatrist/psychologist?


2. to a priest,
monk?


3. to Allie?


4. to
Phoebe?


J. Narrating from a “rest
home”


1. psychiatrist’s
office?


2. mental facility?


3.
D.B.’s pad?


K. Only rants and complains (no
morals)


L. Holden is marginalized (exists on the fringes of
society)

What is your impression of Mayella Ewell? On what are you basing it? What role does Atticus' questions play in forming this impression?

Mayella Ewell is definitely a young woman deserving of
some pity in To Kill a Mockingbird. She is stuck with an
evil drunkard of a father who beats her and possibly even takes advantage of her
sexually. With her mother dead, she is forced to raise the remainder of the Ewell clan
herself. She has no friends, no money and no prospects for the future. She asks Tom to
come to her house out of loneliness, and she later tells him that she has never been
kissed, so "she might as well kiss a nigger."


Of course,
Mayella is still guilty of framing Tom for her supposed rape. No doubt it was her father
who did the beating after catching her with Tom, but she still bears the responsibility
for going along with the story that her father has concocted. Her fear of her father
left her with little choice.

Are multiparty systems necessarily more representative than the two party system in the United States? why or why not?

For the most part, I would say that they are more
representative, but I would not say that they are necessarily
so.


They are generally more representative because in those
systems, smaller parties can more accurately represent the wishes of their members.  For
example, if we had a "Tea Party Party" in the US, it could accurately represent its
members' attitudes without having to compromise.


However,
in such systems, parties might have a harder time representing people who feel that
there are many important issues.  For example, if we had an anti-abortion party and an
anti-tax party and an anti-environmentalism party, what representation would there be
for people who think all of those are equally important?  Or for those who think that
two of the three are but one is not?


Voters all have
different mixes of issue attitudes and issue salience and even multiparty systems cannot
accurately represent everyone.


One other issue to consider
is that, in a multi-party system, you are often voting for slates of candidates rather
than being able to specifically vote for a given person.  You could say this is less
representative as well.

Thursday, December 8, 2011

In what ways does the Party employ technology? Another version of the question: How does technology affect the Party’s ability to control its...

I believe the Party uses technology mainly as a way to
control its citizens.  It does this by using technology for surveillance and for
propaganda.


The main image of technology in
1984 is, to me, the television screen.  These screens are two-way
things that allow some one to watch everyone who has a screen all the time.  We also
know that the Party can plant microphones in various places.  If you never knew when the
Party was watching you or listening to you, I would think that would control you a
lot.


The Party also uses the screens and movies for
propaganda.  It uses them, for example, in the Two Minutes Hate.  This sort of use
affects the way people think.  That helps the Party control them as
well.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Solve the equation x^3-4x^2+6x-4=0, given that l+i is a root of this equation.

We have to solve the equation given that 1+ i is a root of
the equation. As complex roots always come in pairs with their complex conjugate, 1 - i
is also a root of the equation.


So we have (x - (1 + i))( x
- (1 -i))(x - a) = x^3-4x^2+6x-4=0, where the final root is
a


(x - (1 + i))( x - (1 -i))(x - a) =
x^3-4x^2+6x-4=0


=> (x - 1- i)(x - 1 + i)(x - a) =
x^3 - 4x^2 + 6x - 4


=> [(x - 1)^2 - i^2](x - a) =
x^3 - 4x^2 + 6x - 4


=> (x^2 + 1 - 2x + 1)(x - a) =
x^3 - 4x^2 + 6x - 4


=> (x^2 - 2x + 2)(x - a) = x^3 -
4x^2 + 6x - 4


=> x^3 - 2x^2 + 2x - ax^2 + 2ax - 2a =
x^3 - 4x^2 + 6x - 4


=> - ax^2 + 2ax - 2a = -2x^2 +
4x - 4


Equate the numeric term -2a =
-4


=> a =
2


The roots of the equation are (2 , 1 + i ,
1 - i)

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

How do you think the Soviet Union felt about the United States and its numerous alliance systems?cold war alliance systems

In a word, threatened.  While US policy and that of the
West during the Cold War was one of containment, and didn't threaten the Soviets
directly, you have to remember that Russia had been invaded by Germany twice in the last
half century, so the formation of the NATO alliance with hundreds of thousands of troops
and eventually nuclear weapons made them feel insecure, and rightfully so. They formed
the Warsaw Pact alliance in response to NATO, pure and
simple.


I think the Soviets were less threatened by our
ANZUS alliance (Australia-New Zealand-US) or the alliance with Japan, but it did pose
more of a threat to China and to communist expansion in the region which the Soviets
supported.

What is postcolonial literature?

As the term indicates, the idea of postcolonial literature
is reflective of life after colonial rule in nations that were controlled by parent
nations.  The idea of how life and identity is constructed after colonialism is rich
with ideas, and is a basic element of postcolonial literature.  The genre seeks to
examine how the past influences the present and the future, or, in a more postmodern
sense, how there is not such a clear distinction of time.  The issues of racial identity
plays a large role in postcolonial literature.  At the same time, postcolonial
literature seeks to assess how the identity of nations that are controlled and how the
identity of people in colonized nations could parallel one another.  At the same time,
postcolonial literature is intensely constructed on the idea of what constitutes purity
in one's identity.  For example, in postcolonial literature, the idea of how much of
one's national or individual identity is contingent on the parent nation or the freed
one is extremely important to the genre.

Monday, December 5, 2011

Was the fall of Rome inevitable?

There is tremendous scholarly debate on this very
question; particularly in the last few years. The major factor in the fall of Rome was,
of course, the Barbarian migrations. ("Barbarian" was a term originating with the
Greeks, who said that the language of the German tribes sounding like the sounds of
sheep.) The Roman Empire had grown so large that it's borders were tremendous, and
difficult to patrol. Now, let's muddy the water a bit. In the year 376 (one hundred
years before the end of Empire) the Romans allowed the Goths to cross over to escape
from the oncoming Huns. This in essence opened Pandora's box. The Goths continued to
stream over, and occupied Roman lands. Needless to say, they did not pay Roman taxes,
which reduced the Empire's income. The Huns themselves were a factor. The Romans had a
tenuous relationship with the Huns under Attila, which mainly consisted of the Romans
buying them off.


Then there was internal strife within the
Empire. Roman armies, since Julius Caesar, were loyal to their commander, who typically
(but not always) was the Emperor. (Another little known factor: the Emperor himself was
known as the "Augustus," his successor as the "Caesar.") During a time of dissension,
there were as many as four claimants to the throne, all supported by their troops. Out
of 27 Emperors, only one actually died of natural causes. The others were either
murdered or committed suicide.


To muddy the water even
further; Germanic tribes often fought in the Roman Armies as mercenaries. They often
sided with one General or another, generally with the highest bidder. Finally, when a
General named Orestes installed his son (a feeble minded teenager) as Emperor, (Romulus
II Augustulus) the Germanic General Odoacher put an end to the nonsense by having
Orestes put to death, and forcing Romulus to abdicate. He then forwarded the crown and
purple robe of the Emperor to the Emperor in Constantinople with a letter that he was
the sole Roman Emperor now.


So, the variables would be
internal dissension, Germanic migrations (invasion is probably too strong a word) the
pressure created by the Huns, and the sheer size of the Empire. Could it have been
prevented? Probably, but to do so, the process would have had to be modified at least
100 years before the actual collapse.


Several excellent
sources you might consider: Adrian Goldsworthy: How Rome Fell, Death of a
Superpower;
and also Christopher Kelly, The End of Empire: Attila
the Hun and the Fall of Rome.

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Verify that f(x) = 2x/( k(k + 1)) for x = 1, 2, 3, . . . ,k can serve as the probability distribution of a random variable in a given range

If f(x) = 2x/k(k+1), x= 1, 2, 3,
4,....k.


To verify whether this is probability distribution
function, we should prove that {Sum f(x) over x = 1, 2, 3, 4,...k} =
1.


x takes a discrete value. That is x takes values like
 x= 1, 2, 3, 4, ......, k.


Let X be the random
variable


f(X =x) = 2x/k(k+1) = 2x/k(k+1), x= 1, 2, 3,
4....k.


Total frequency = {Sum f(X = x) , x= 1, 2, 3,
...n.} =
2*1/k(k+1)+2*2/k(k+1)+2*3/k9k+1)...2*k/k(k+1).


{Sum f(X =
x) , x= 1, 2, 3, ...n.} =
{2/k(k+1)}{1+2+3+..........k}


{Sum f(X = x) , x= 1, 2, 3,
...n.} = {2/k(k+1)}{Sum of the k natural numbers starting from
1}.


{Sum f(X = x) , x= 1, 2, 3, ...n.} =
{2/(k(k+1)}{k(+1)/2}


{Sum f(X = x) , x= 1, 2, 3, ...n.} =
1..


Therefore f(x) is a frequency density function. Or f(x)
is a probability distribution function.

What does "Bicameral Legislature" mean?

A bicameral legislature is one that is split up into two
houses.  Many legislatures around the world are split in this way.  For example, the
Congress of the United States is split up between the House of Representatives and the
Senate.


Bicameral legislatures are generally set up as a
way of providing checks and balances in a governmental system.  In a bicameral system
like that of the US, proposed bills must pass both houses of the legislature before they
can become law.  This makes it harder to pass legislation than it would be in a
unicameral (only one house of the legislature) system.

Determine if the line y+x-2 = 0 and the line 6y-3x +8 = 0 are parallel, perpendicular, or neither.

Given the lines:


y + x -2 =
0


6y-3x + 8 =0


We need to
determine the relation between the lines ( parallel, perpendicular, or
neither)


First we will use the slope to find the
relation.


If the slopes are equal, then the lines are
parallel.


if the product of the slopes is -1, then the
slope are perpendicular.


Let us rewrite the equations of
the lines into the slope form.


==> y = -x + 2
............(1)


==> y = (3/6)x -
8/6


==> y= (1/2)x -
4/3........(2)


We notice that the slopes are not equal.
then the lines are not parallel.


Also, the product of the
slopes is -1*1/2 = -1/2 , then the lines are not
perpendicular.


Then the slopes are not
parallel nor perpendicular.

In Book 13 of The Odyssey, why does Athena test Odysseus?

I think there are two elements two think about in
answering this question. Firstly, the gods in both The Iliad and The Odyssey are shown
to be quite a fickle group, using their human heroes to champion their petty squabbles
against other gods and treating them as playthings. Thus, in a sense, Athena can test
her hero because she is a goddess and she can do what she
likes.


However, also, it is important to remember what kind
of character Odysseus is. He is not known as "the wily Odysseus" for nothing, and
certainly throughout the rest of the book disguise, deception and illusion are used
readily and frequently to trick, beguile and deceive. Thus, there is something fitting
in Odysseus not realising he has reached Ithaca in this book: the deceiver is himself
deceived. Of course, once Odysseus realises his location, he immediately determines to
employ deception to achieve his goal until the grey-eyed goddess Athena reveals truth
through her own act of self-revelation.

Saturday, December 3, 2011

What are some quotes that reflect images of sight/blindness, animals, and hell/demons from the play Othello?

One of the first, and a relatively famous animal quote is
from Iago as he calls up to Brabantio's house in the middle of the night in reference to
his daughter being with Othello: "Even now, no, very now, an old black ram Is tupping
your white ewe."  Of course he is trying to make the image as repellant as possible to
arouse anger in Brabantio and drive him to attack Othello the moor.  Just a little bit
later he says againto Brabantio:


readability="9">

you'll have your daughter covered with a Barbary
horse, you'll have your nephews neigh to you, you'll have coursers for cousins, and
jennets for germans.



Pretty
nasty stuff!


A quote close by that reflects the idea of
vision or blindness is from the First Senator after the Duke asks him how it is possible
that the Turkish preparation makes for Rhodes rather than for Cyprus:  "'Tis a pageant
to keep us in false gaze" reflecting the idea that they have been looking the wrong
way.

Friday, December 2, 2011

How does my fake journal entry I wrote for Chris McCandless fit Chapter 16 of Into the Wild?My assignment was to write a poem, journal entry, or...

I like this initial response, and I think you have come up
with a number of great ideas. Here are a few more ideas to help you develop this
assignment and get an even better mark. You might want to develop what specifically
Chris learnt from his months of solitude and how he has changed as a result. It was
always his intention and dream to stay for longer in Alaska, so you need to explain
fully why he chose to attempt to leave earlier. You might even have him thinking about
some of the many characters he met along the way and thinking about those relationships
and how important they are to him, as he realises it
now.


Lastly, I would write a lot more about what Chris felt
and experienced when he tries to leave and can't. Would he berate himself for not
realising the impact of sping on the ice in Alaska? How would he feel? We are told later
by the author of this great book that if he had a map, he would have realised that he
could have crossed the river in another location, very close to where he was. Would he
wish that he had taken a map? I guess that having decided to make such a big decision,
and then to have that choice taken away from him, is going to make Chris feel upset,
frustrated and annoyed. You need to try and capture that in his
feelings.


Good luck, though! This is a great start and by
considering my questions you should be able to get a good grade.

Discuss Andrew Marvell as a metaphysical poet.

Andrew Marvell in his poem "To His Coy Mistress"
demonstrates two characteristics of poetry we, today, categorize as
metaphysical.


He uses stretched metaphors, for example.  In
part one of his syllogism, or logical argument designed to convince his target--a
woman--to sleep with him, he refers to their love as "vegetable love."  The idea is that
if they were immortal and could spend centuries in the wooing stage
of love making, their love could grow as slowly as a vegetable.  The metaphor is
stretched, of course.  The slow growing rate of a vegetable is not normally compared to
love growing.


Secondly, Marvell displays and revels in his
wit and intelligence and learning.  In the second part of his syllogism, in which he
centers on the mortality of humans, he concludes with


readability="10">

The grave's a fine and private
place,


But none, I think, do there
embrace.



And later, in part
three, he says that the lovers should be like "amorous birds of
prey."


The grave couplet demonstrates his wit and keeps the
poem a little lighter than the morbid imagery might otherwise make
it.


The comparison of lovers to loving predators
demonstrates both a stretched metaphor and wit.


The
stretched metaphors, the wit displayed, and, additionally, the carpe diem theme, mark
Marvell as a metaphysical poet.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

What are the main arguments of Madison Jones's essay "A Good Man's Predicament," which deals with Flannery O'Connor's story "A Good Man Is Hard to...

In his essay “A Good Man’s Predicament,” Madison Jones
essentially takes issue with Flannery O’Connor’s own interpretation of the very end of
the story.  Jones offers a different interpretation and suggests that his own reading
may be truer to the actual phrasing of the story and to reality (at least as reality is
generally understood) than is O’Connor’s interpretation.  He implies that the two
interpretations may not be incompatible, but he suggests that if they
cannot be reconciled, then his interpretation makes better sense of
the story.


In an essay on “A Good Man Is Hard to Find,”
O’Connor herself had argued that God uses the grandmother to touch The Misfit, both
literally and figuratively.  This touch was a moment of grace – an opportunity for The
Misfit to transform his life spiritually, if only he would take advantage of the
opportunity.  By reaching out to The Misfit (O’Connor had argued), the grandmother truly
and finally lives her Christian faith:


readability="12">

The Grandmother is at last alone, facing the
Misfit.  Her head clears for an instant and she realizes. even in her limited way, that
she is responsible for the man before her and joined to him by ties of kinship which
have their roots deep in the mystery she has been merely prattling about so far.  And at
this point, she does the right thing, she makes the right
gesture.



The fact that the
grandmother was killed by The Misfit as a result of her gesture meant nothing to
O’Connor.  We are all destined to die, but the grandmother’s gesture had given a depth
of meaning to her life that it had hitherto lacked. Her dead body is ultimately
unimportant; her spiritual salvation is all that truly
matters.


Jones resists this Christian interpretation, or at
least he suggests that it is not the only one that makes sense of the story.  Instead,
he argues as follows:


readability="13">

Given the Misfit's image of himself, [the
grandmother's] words and her touching, blessing him, amount to intolerable insult, for
hereby she includes him among the world's family of vulgarians. One of her children, her
kind, indeed!



In other words,
The Misfit kills the grandmother not because God uses the grandmother as an instrument
of grace but because her touch violates his pride.  Jones leaves open the possibility
that The Misfit may perceive the grandmother as an instrument of
God, but he argues that there is no reason why readers must share that perception.  The
story, in other words, makes perfect sense from a secular perspective and using secular
psychology.  There is nothing, necessarily, miraculous about the grandmother’s gesture
or The Misfit’s response. The Misfit may even perceive the
grandmother as an instrument of God, but readers do not necessarily have to share this
perception in order to appreciate the story or find it
meaningful.


A critic of Jones’s interpretation might argue
that he fails to discuss various details in the end of the story that support O’Connor’s
reading (particularly our final view of the grandmother, “with her legs crossed under
her like a child's and her face smiling up at the cloudless sky”), but Jones’s reading,
as he himself suggests, may not necessarily conflict with
O’Connor’s.

What is s(t) if s'(t)=36t^5+4t^3?

According to the rule, s(t) could be determined evaluating
the indefinite integral of s'(t)


Int
(36t^5+4t^3)dt


We'll apply the additive property of
integrals:


Int (36t^5+4t^3)dt = Int (36 t^5)dt + Int (4
t^3)dt


We'll re-write the sum of integrals, taking out the
constants:


Int (36t^5+4t^3)dt = 36 Int t^5 dt + 4Int t^3
dt


Int (36t^5+4t^3)dt = 36*x^6/6 +
4*x^4/4


We'll simplify and we'll
get:


Int (36t^5+4t^3)dt = 6x^6 + x^4 +
C


The function  s(t)
is: 
 s(t) = 6x^6 + x^4 +
C

When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer Read Walt Whitman’s poem below. What implications may it have, not just for this course, but for your...

If you are pursuing a master's degree, you are going to
have to learn a lot of information. Depending on your field, it may be mathematical
formulas, scientific data, a vast body of literature -- no matter. However, in this
poem, the poet acknowledges that sometimes one can suffer from information
overload.


readability="11">

When the proofs, the figures, were ranged in
columns before me;


When I was shown the charts and the
diagrams, to add, divide and measure
them;



When the poet considers
all of the "stuff" of learning, he becomes bored and goes outside and looks at the night
sky. Ah! He is instantly amazed, for in gazing at the sky, he is really learning. He is
not bored. He is soaking in a true appreciation of the world. He can learn more by
observing the real "learned astronomer" who is the creator of the
"perfect silence" of the stars. It is a mystical experience for
him.


So, like the poet, will the learning that you obtain
from your advanced degree enrich your life? It should. If not, it will merely be proofs,
figures, charts and diagrams.

Monday, November 28, 2011

In Romeo and Juliet, who are three characters whose personality traits complement or contrast each others' personalities?I need THREE characters...

Tybalt, Mercutio, and Benvoliorepresent three diverse
points along a conitnuum. Tybalt is fiery and hot-blooded, with a short temper that is
prone to violence and confrontation. We see this in the opening fight scene and just
prior to the death of Mercutio. Benvolio, on the other hand, is at the opposite end of
this spectrum (as is Romeo, who might also be inserted here). He resists violence and
confrontation and seeks peace the vast majority of the time. In the opening fight scene
he resists engaging Tybalt as long as he possibly can and finally does fight only to
protect himself. In fact, Benvolio opens Act III by trying to avoid
confrontation:


readability="0">

I pray thee, good Mercutio, let's
retire:

The day is hot, the Capulets
abroad,

And, if we meet, we shall not scape a
brawl;

For now, these hot days, is the mad blood
stirring.



It is
Mercutio, then, who represents a kind of middle ground between Tybalt and Benvolio.
Mercutio fights when provoked and certainly doesn't shy away from engaging such
situations, but it is not Mercutio who actually starts the fight. Mercutio seems to
swing back and forth between the hot-headedness of Tybalt and Benvolio's desire for
peace. In fact, Mercutio's name comes from the word "mercurial," meaning
"characterized by rapid and unpredictable changeableness of mood;
a mercurial temper."

Sunday, November 27, 2011

I just need to make sure one thing, communism is related to 'after the bomb' because communism was spreading rapidly after the cold war.So it would...

Communism became a worldwide phenomenon in the late 19th
century.  Anyone interested in philosophy during this period took a long, hard look at
the idealism of communism.  In the early 20th century, communist powers took control of
Russia and surrounding countries (changing the name to the Soviet Union).  China and
Cuba were taken over by communist factions afterwords.  In the middle to late 20th
century, communist nations were aiding communist factions in taking over countries such
as Korea, Veitnam, Afghanistan, the Balkans, and some other places.  This was viewed as
a threat to the nations of the West.


The Cold War is a
concept referring to the building of two nations with large-scale nuclear capability. 
The Unitied States stated that communism is evil.  Communism is, by nature,
anti-capitalist.  This is where the bad blood starts.  At its heart, communism is a
system that is supposed to help the common people that capitalism theoretically
alienates.  In a capitalist society, there is a percentage of people who have most of
the moeny; communism was supposed to rectify that.  However, the leaders that arose in
communist nations seemed to use the ideals of communism to rally support for their more
selfish motives.


For those who did not live during the time
of The Cold War, it can be equated somewhat to the way that people in the United States
look at Muslims as being dangerous.  There are some bad people associated with the
Muslim faith, taking its tenets a bit too far.  The difference, though, is that there
were a couple of very large nations with governments possessing large armies that were
seen as "the bad guys" instead of small radical groups.  It was a frightening time, a
time in which everyone thought the world could end at any
moment.


I hope this helps with your
question.

Why does Catherine take three nights off from night duty?Ernest Hemingway's A Farewell to Arms

After being hit during a bombardment, Henry loses a
kneecap. When he is transferred to Milan where he will have an operation, Catherine
Barkley arrives at the hospital.  Henry holds her tightly when she comes to
him:



"You
mustn't," she said.  "You're not well enought."


"Yes, I
am.  Come on."


..."Fell our hearts
beating."


"I don't care about our hearts.  I want you.  I'm
just mad about you."


"You really love
me?"



Catherine is hesitant
about lovemaking as she has already lost a fiance; however, she gives in to Henry. 
Their act is for Henry, at least in part, an escape from the horrors of war. That Henry
escapes his tormenting thoughts with Catherine is evinced as Catherine works night duty
and sees Henry whenever she can.  Henry, then, talks with Ferguson, who suggests that
Catherine take off from night duty and get some rest. Henry agrees. When Miss Gage, who
declares herself Henry's "friend," enters and talks with Henry, she says that she will
be glad to help him. The next day Henry learns that Catherine has taken three nights off
her night duty.  When she returns, Henry states, "It was as though we met again after
each of us had been away on a long journey."               

Calculate tan(x-y), if sin x=1/2 and sin y=1/3. 0

We'll write the formula of the tangent of difference of 2 angles. tan (x-y) = (tan x - tan y)/(1 + tan x*tan y) ...