What are the criticisms of the UN and its lack of effectiveness?

The major criticisms of the UN and of any other
international, collective security body are that A) it has no power to make anyone obey
its commands and B) it has no real will to make hard decisions because its members
cannot agree on anything.

If you look at the issue going on
with Iran and its nuclear weapons, you can see how this would be.  The UN has told Iran
over and over to stop with its nuclear program.  Iran pretty much just refuses and does
what it wants.  The UN cannot get really tough on Iran because Russia and especially
China do not really want to punish Iran.

So the UN is too
wishy-washy to make a decision and too weak to enforce any decision it does
make.

Write the themes of the poem"the second coming" in detail.

"The Second Coming" by Yeats presents a second coming of a
different kind; different from the second coming Christian tradition
presents.

The poem presents social upheaval and nightmarish
violence.  The falcon cannot hear the falcon, and thus cannot be controlled:  chaos
results.  Those who could do something about the discord "lack conviction," while the
worst are filled with "passionate intensity."  An ambiguous, sphinx-like creature with a
"gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,/Is moving its slow thighs" toward Bethlehem
(metaphorically) to be born.  The "rough beast" is coming.  Nightmarish violence is
coming:  not the second coming of Christ that tradition
expects.

Human history is about to take a turn for the
worse.

Yeats is responding to upheaval and violence in the
world, and particularly in the Russian revolution.  The 20th century is on the verge of
something terrible, the  poem suggests.  And of course, Yeats was correct.  Human beings
were never so good at killing other human beings as they were in the
20th-century.

Find the integral of the function h(x) = x^3 -3x^2 +2 for the interval [0,1].

To find  the integral of the function h(x) = x^3 -3x^2 +2 
for the interval [0,1].

Int h(x) dx = H(x)  = Int (x^3
-3x^2 +2) dx.

H(x) = Int x^3 dx- Int 3x^2 dx+ Int 2dx +C
constant C.

H(x) = (1/4)x^4 -3(1/3)x^3+ 2x+
C

H(x) = (1/4)x^4 = x^3+2x
+C

Therefore Int h(x) dx from x= 0  to x= 1 is H(1)-
H(0).

H(1) - H(0) = {1/4)1^4-1^3
+2+C}-{1/4)0^4-0^3+2*0+C.

H(1) - H(0) = 1/4-1+2 , as other
terms cancel.

H(1)- H(0) =
5/4.

Therefore {Int h(x) dx  from x= 0 to x = 1} =
5/4.

What flaws does the narrator have in "The Scarlet Ibis"?

Central to this tragic tale is the inability of the elder
brother, the narrator of this story, to allow his brother to be who he is. He is clearly
driven to train and teach Doodle how to do physical activities that are mostly beyond
him, and yet this compulsion is not borne out of a sense of love or compassion for his
pitiful younger brother. Rather, the text makes clear that it is a sense of
embarrassment and pride that leads the narrator to invest so much time with Doodle and
try to "improve" him. Note that the text informs us that the narrator teaches Doodle to
walk because he was "embarrassed" to have a five-year-old younger brother who can't
walk. This leads to a moment of tragic realisation when Doodle displays his talent to
their parents, and the narrator realises what motivated him to work with Doodle so
hard:

They did
not know that I did it for myself; that pride, whose slave I was, spoke to me louder
than all their voices; and that Doodle walked only because I was ashamed of having a
crippled brother.

Thus the
narrator here himself identifies his biggest flaw: pride, who, as he says, had him in
slavery. It is this same pride that leads us to the story's tragic conclusion. When the
narrator and Doodle are forced to admit failure, note what the narrator
says:

We never
spoke (what are the words that can solder cracked pride?), but I knew he was watching
me, watching for a sign of
mercy.

Key to identify is the
metaphor comparing the "cracked pride" of the narrator to an object that cannot be
soldered together again or repaired. Doodle is described as desperately watching for a
"sign of mercy," but this is something that, because of his slavery to pride, he is able
to fulfil.

In a sense, then, Doodle meets his sad and
tragic end precisely because of the flaw of his brother, who is unable to accept Doodle
for who he is, with his limitations, and thus is driven by his pride to try and
transform him into something that Doodle could never be.

Can you help me find examples of figurative language from the third part of the book?

1) METAPHOR: "Lights flicked on and house doors opened all
down the street, to watch the carnival set up...in which torches wuld be juggled and
fire eaten." (Although the author does not use the words like
or as he is comparing the scene at Montag's house
to a carnival.)

2)
ALLUSION: "Old Montag wanted to fly near the sun and now that he's burnt his damn wings,
he wonders why." (Beatty is referring to the Greek myth of Daedalus and
Icarus, in which a man and his son manage to fly by attaching wings to their
shoulders; see link below.) 

3) SIMILE: "He felt
his head turn like a stone carving to dark place next door" (A comparison is
made, using the word like).

4) ANAPHORA: "She
saw everything.  She didn't do anything to anyone.  She just let them alone."
(The word she is repeated at the beginning of each
sentence.)

In "The House of Usher", what might Madeline and the widening fissure, or crack, symbolize?symbolic meaning of Madeline symbolic meaning of...

In his macabre short story, "The House of Usher," Edgar
Allan Poe employs one of his techniques which he uses, the double
entendre.  That is, the narrative and its ideas turn and duplicate
themselves in meaning  Madeline and the house itself are examples of this use
of double entendre. 

As the title of
Poe's story, "The House of Usher" the implication is made that the narrative will be
about a family and its history.  And, while this is true, the title is a
double entendre since the structural house, also is the house of
Usher, or as put in Modern English, the Ushers' house.  Thus connected, the fissure in
the mansion is symbolic of the genetic
breakdown of the Usher family, a degeneration that is most apparent in
the character of Madeline Usher, the feminine, or physically weaker, side of the twins,
Roderick and Madeline.  But, it is also manifested in Roderick, who, experiences "a
strong shudder over his whole person" much like the "shuddering" of the house. In
addition, Madeline is a double entendre; her physical ailments are
manifested in Roderick's mental ailments; both have the same meaning derived from the
fact that the Usher line is far too thin and they are twins who share genetic traits.
Thus, Madeline's bizarre physical condition symbolizes the deterioration
of Roderick's mind.

Explain what the following quotation tells us about Linda's character in Brave New World. Explain what the quotations given below show us about...

Obviously, Linda has never been able to assimilate into
the civilization at the Indian Reservation.  After she has ruined one of the weaving
looms and she has offended the woman so much that they have beaten her because she has
slept with their men thinking that "everyone belongs to everyone" as she has been
conditioned to do so, it is clear that her hypnopoedia has been effective. Linda is
truly a product of her environment and desires to return to it.  But, her return to
civilization is futile:

readability="16">

The return to ciilization was for her the return
to soma, was the possibility of lying in bed and taking holiday
after holiday, wihtout ever having to come back to a headache or a fit of vomiting,
without ever being made to feel as you always felt after peyotl, as
though you'd done something so shamefully anti-social that you could never hold up yhour
head again.  Soma played none of these unpleasant tricks.  The
holiday it gave was perfect and, if the morning after was disagreeable, it was so, not
intrinsically, but only by comparison with the joys of the
holiday.

Linda longs for the
escape that the New World offers from pain, from guilt, from life.  Soma
sends her into the world of "real acetate silk."  (Silk is silk, not acetate,
a synthetic material.)  Having known the real world, Linda now wishes to escape
it.

What are the similarities and differences between the characters Othello and Oedipus?

I think that the comparisons are both very interesting.  A
significant similarity between both heroes is that they allow their judgment to be
clouded by personal emotion.  For Oedipus, pride becomes his undoing and for Othello,
personal doubt and insecurity helps to unravel all that was good around him.  Both of
them are accompanied by loyal and honorable women who suffer because of them.  Jocasta
was loyal to her husband/ son until the revelations became too much to bear, taking her
own life.  Desdemona, contrary to Othello's own fears, was above reproach as a wife, and
suffered greatly because of him.  Finally, both have to deal with the chasm between the
titles and respect afforded to them by society and their own understanding of identity
as human beings.  In both dramas, we see that the titles conferred by society and
political orders do not prevent the hollowness of individual character or identity from
coming to the forefront of the surface.  Significant differences are present, as well. 
Othello dies, while Oedipus lives.  I find this importance because one is able to die
with their tragic condition, while another one is condemned to live.  The presence of
children also changes dimensions significantly.  Had Othello and Desdemona had children,
it is interesting to ponder how things would have been different.  It's difficult for
Iago to hold so much sway over him if children had been present.

What was the role of righteousness in the law code of Hamurabi?

I believe the question refers to the Code of
Hammurabi introduced by Hammurabi who ruled Babylon from 1792 to 1750
B.C.

Hammurabi was formulated incorporating and revising,
and expanding older collections of Sumerian and Akkadian laws. This code had great
influence on the civilization of all near eastern
countries.

Hammurabi's code consisted mainly of a long list
of rules to settle specific types of cases, involving matters such as false accusation,
witchcraft, military service, land and business regulations, family laws, tariffs,
wages, trade, loans, debts and theft. The code described the nature of punishment for
different types of offences committed, which were harsh by today's standards. The code
contains nearly 300 provisions.

On central principle
discernible in the code is  that "the strong shall not injure the weak."  The code set
up a social order based on the rights of the individual and backed by the authority of
Babylonian gods and the state.

A complete translation of
the code of Hammurabi is available at the website referred
below.

Why were Africans successful in gaining independence from colonial rule?

There were economic realities and political movements that
contributed to African nations throwing off their colonial masters as
well.

Economically, the two largest empires in Africa by
the post-World War II era, France and Britain, went broke.  England was mostly broke
after World War II, and it was no longer feasible for them to project military power
around the globe, or fight wars of subjugation on the African continent.  France had
suffered economic devastation under Nazi occupation, then fought a protracted and
ultimately losing effort in Indochina, and then an insurgency in Algeria.  Their empire
collapsed as a result, and the influence of both nations was replaced by that of the US
and the USSR.

Politically, Pan-Africanism, a movement to
unite African peoples and erase colonial borders, became more popular in the 1950s and
60s, as did Marxism, which many African supported as a means to address the glaring
economic differences between wealthy colonial masters and the native peoples of that
land.

So it makes sense that 1960 was considered the "Year
of African Independence", as seventeen separate nations declared their
independence.

What is the role of the Virgen de Guadalupe in Bless Me, Ultima, by Rudolfo Anaya?

The Virgen de Guadalupe is the Southwestern Catholic
equivalent of the Virgin Mary, and is said to have appeared to a peasant along the banks
of the Guadalupe River.  Anaya's story, which takes place in New Mexico in the 1940s,
has characters which venerate the Virgen de Guadalupe, as residents in that area
currently do, and his book is full of references to
her.

This starts in chapter one, where Antonio sees the
Virgen carrying Ultima's owl up to heaven.  It answers a difficult spiritual question
for him:  What happens to baby's who have not been baptized and therefore forgiven for
their natural sins? The Virgen carries them to heaven instead of "Limbo" which more
strict Catholics of that time believed.

So the Virgen is
really a native saint, with dark features, who was said to have spoken the native
language.  It is one of many ways in which Bless Me, Ultima
portrays the mix between Spanish Catholicism and native ways and beliefs.  Ultima
herself is another way.

How did Leif Enger in Peace Like a River take the non-universal experience of hunting in the freezing cold and render it a universal “moment”?

Peace Like a River, by Leif Enger,
follows the Land family on an extraordinary journey. The family consists of Jeremiah
Land and his three children: Davy, Reuben, and his daughter Swede. They live in the
rather rustic north, and the three children go goose-hunting early one morning and then
come home for a bit. Reuben says:

readability="7">

That's how goose-hunting is--you rise early and
do the cold, thrilling work; then come in and eat; then fatigue sneaks up and knocks you
flat.

After they are rested,
the three kids go hunting again that "afternoon, under skies so cold frost paisleyed the
gunbarrels." Davy lets Swede, desperate to shoot a goose, take the first shot. As an
older brother, he is patient and allows her to fail before stepping in and killing the
escaping bird. Their hunting trip is successful.

It is fair
to assume that not many people have gone hunting on a frigid morning or even an
afternoon when it was so cold that guns frost over; as you say, it is a "non-universal
experience." While this is not an extraordinary event for the Lands, what makes the
scene universal is the companionship and cooperation of family to accomplish a
goal.

Getting up early to do something together, then
coming home and taking a nap before doing the next thing, is something most of us can
understand and have experienced. Enger is able to take an out-of-the-ordinary experience
and make it ordinary and universal by connecting it to something his readers have
experienced.

For what reasons did industrialization NOT take off in the South?This is from my ap us history class, much of this chapter is about slavery and...

The major reason that industry did not take off in the
South was slavery.  By the time that industry arose in the rest of the US, slavery was
so entrenched in the South that industry could not take
hold.

This is true for a number of
reasons.

First, slaves are not that well suited to the type
of work that characterizes factories.  Slaves would be too able to destroy expensive
machinery "by mistake" as a way of resistance.

Second, much
of the wealth of the South was tied up in slaves.  This wealth could not easily be
liquidated in order to buy the sorts of expensive machines that would have been
needed.

Third, the South had created its whole society
around the image of country gentlemen who had their plantations and lived a rural
lifestyle with horses and hunting and such.  This would have been ruined by a move to an
industrial system.

So the main barrier between the South
and industrialization was slavery.

Please give a sample of an introduction on a paper on abortion.Specifically of mention would be law reform on abortion.

I think that you are probably going to have to compose
this on your own.  Yet, you probably could get many insights on how to write this here. 
I think that a good introduction on the topic would briefly address why legal reform on
the issue or even legal statements on the issue have been so challenging.  This would
embrace the idea of how the Constitutional issues of federalism, in terms of state and
federal government differentiation on the topic, and personal choice have have helped to
confuse and complicate the issue.  At the same time, I think that the introduction might
want to talk about how the issue has become so politicized that legal reform is very
difficult to accomplish.  Discussion of it being a "litmus test" or "hot potato" issue
might be relevant here.  I think that the introduction should probably close with what
you intend on proving in the course of the paper on the topic.  Along these lines, your
introduction should embrace a good understanding and feel of what is going to be
discussed in the paper.  In the end, this might be why you would have to compose this. 
You alone understand what your paper is going to address and prove.  The reader is going
to be led to this conclusion and your introduction would be a start on such a
quest.

Can you find some passages in "Barn Burning" which illustrate Faulkner's stream-of-consciousness style?

Look no further than the first paragraph of Faulkner's
"Barn Burning" to find his free-style stream-of-consciousness
narration:

readability="23">

The store in which the justice of the Peace's
court was sitting smelled of cheese. The boy, crouched on his nail keg at the back of
the crowded room, knew he smelled cheese, and more: from where he sat he could see the
ranked shelves close-packed with the solid, squat, dynamic shapes of tin cans whose
labels his stomach read, not from the lettering which meant nothing to his mind but from
the scarlet devils and the silver curve of fish - this, the cheese which he knew he
smelled and the hermetic meat which his intestines believed he smelled coming in
intermittent gusts momentary and brief between the other constant one, the smell and
sense just a little of fear because mostly of despair and grief, the old fierce pull of
blood. He could not see the table where the Justice sat and before which his father and
his father's enemy (our enemy he thought in that despair; ourn! mine and hisn both! He's
my father!) stood, but he could hear them, the two of them that is, because his father
had said no word yet:

"But what proof have you, Mr.
Harris?"

Okay, okay, so the
first sentence is not much of a stream.  It's only 15 words.  But those last two
sentences are long, coiling snakes.  The second sentence is 118 words!  It moves from
boy to cheese to cans to meat to fish to fear to grief to blood.  It is spatial,
external, and internal description.

The third sentence is
61 words, including its jump off into dialogue.  With its parentheses, triple
exclamations, internal ("ourn") and external dialogue ("But what proof...?"), the third
sentence is a little bit of everything.  It's part third person, part Sarty in its point
of view.

Through Faulkner's use of synesthetic imagery, the
reader can smell, taste, and touch the tension in the setting, as we, like Sarty, begin
to feel surrounded and confused.

What are possible good strong essay topics for This is What it Means to Say Pheonix, Arizona?

This chapter of Alexie's book is often used to teach
satire. In particular Alexie satirizes the life of the Indian, and the impression
current Americans have of Indians. We see this in the experience between the boys and
the gymnast on the airplane.

This piece focuses on a
relationship between Thomas and Victor. Their friendship
may be a worthwhile topic. Alexie clearly demonstrates a difference between their social
classes and how relationships can often penetrate between those barriers in order to
flourish and grow. Victor doesn't want to need Thomas but he
does.

Thomas' clinging to the old and
accepting the new is another worthwhile topic. He seems to maintain a
balance of culture we should all embrace. The ability to value our heritage, but
maintain necessary advances helps a society thrive.

The
issue of forgiveness that occurs between a son and father, and among friends is another
worthwhile topic.

What would be an example of a metaphor, personification or a smilie in the story of the Cyclops?

A simile is when a writer compares one thing to another by
using the word "like" or "as."  You can see an example of a simile when Polyphemus the
cyclopes first grabs two of Odysseus's men and kills and eats them.  The narrator says
that the cyclopes

readability="6">

gripped up two of my men at once and dashed them
down upon the ground as though they had been
puppies

By comparing them to
puppies, the narrator is showing how little they were compared to the cycolpes.  He then
goes on to say that the cyclopes ate them as if he were a lion.  That's a simile too. 
He is comparing the cyclopes to a lion to show how vicious and ravenous he
is.

Can you give me an example of an integrated marketing communication campaign? What did the company do that attracted you to the promotion and product?

Integrated marketing refers to the combined total effort
of a company to inform, persuade, or remind customers directly or indirectly about the
products and brands of the company.

Marketing
communications are carried out by a company using the following six modes of
communications which constitute its communication
mix.

1. Advertising: This
   refers to any paid form of communication through a medium of mass
   communication.


2. Sales promotion: This
   refers to any short term incentive to encourage trial purchase or any other specific
   customer action.


3. Events and experiences:Company sponsored
   events or activities that create special experiences for the company.
   


4. Public Relations and publicity:
   Like advertising this form of communication also makes use of mass media to spread
   information designed to promote and protect image and reputation of company and its
   product. However these are more in form of news and other non-paid
   communications.


5. Direct marketing:
   Communicating with individual customers through means of one-to-one distance
   communication such as mail, telephone, e-mail and Internet selling
   system.


6. Personal selling: Primarily face-to-face
   interaction with one or more prospective customer. This includes personal selling
   activities such as making presentations, handling objections, and closing
   sales.

The marketing communication system of
most big companies incorporate all these types of communication methods. Take for
example an automobile companies. They release advertisement in newspapers, special auto 
journals, TV and hoardings.

They also organize sales
promotions campaigns in which customers are offered special deals such as reduced price
or additional guarantee and free servicing for purchases made within a specified period.
Auto companies also run program of demonstrating their products which encourage
prospective customers to test drive the vehicles creating physical experience of driving
their vehicles.

We also see so many articles and news items
about auto companies and their products appearing in various mediums of mass
communication. All efforts of a company to influence such communications constitutes
their public relation and publicity program.

Auto companies
frequently also engage in direct marketing, especially to convince their existing
customer to use car servicing and facilities authorized or operated by the
company.

The company also provides information about their
products on company's Internet selling sites. These site enable the customer to choose
and configure a product they want to buy, get information on the prices and available
financing scheme, and contact information of nearest dealer able to supply the
car.

Finally the auto companies have a large network of
dealership that performs the personal selling function.

How does Shakespeare make Macbeth a character with whom the audience can sympathize?

Shakespeare is notoriously ambiguous in his tragedies,
which contributes to their popularity among teachers and scholars, since they can be
debated relentlessly.  The last I heard, for instance, more commentary had been written
about Hamlet than any other book in existence, except the
Bible. 

Macbeth
is ambiguous, as well.  For instance, many productions of the play show
Banquo's ghost in Act 4.3 at the feast.  The ghost's appearance seems likely to be real,
or actual, in a play filled with the supernatural.  Shakespeare uses a ghost in
Hamlet, why not in Macbeth?  Also, Gertrude in
Hamlet doesn't see the Ghost of King Hamlet during the bedroom
scene when the Ghost is seen by Hamlet, so there is nothing unusual about no one else
seeing Banquo's ghost except Macbeth. 

And if the ghost is
real, then Macbeth is not insane.  I think we misinterpret when we place too much
emphasis on Macbeth's so-called insanity, and relieve him of responsibility by doing
so.  If Macbeth is not responsible, it is because of an overall design by fate or
predestination, an issue important in Elizabethan England due to the Protestant
Reformation, which brought the issue to the attention of
Europeans. 

That said, any sympathy for the character of
Macbeth the audience feels must come from some other source than his insanity.  And it
must not come from feeling that he isn't responsible--he is.  The witches tell him only
that he will be king:  he turns that into the thought that he needs to be king now!  He
turns the prediction into the need to kill Duncan.  Also, he seeks the witches out in
Act 4.1, not the other way around.  He also makes the mistake of cutting his wife out of
the decision-making process once Duncan is dead:  he kills the grooms, orders the
murders of Banquo and Fleance and Macduff's family, all on his own.  These are all
mistakes he makes, without anyone else's help.

So where
does sympathy come from?  His nobility in defending Duncan at the beginning of the play;
his nobility in death at the close of the play; his hopeless situation once he is
surrounded--he is like a bear chained to a tree, attacked by a pack of dogs for the
entertainment of an audience (Act 5.7); from the intellectual side of his personality
that recognizes everything he's done is meaningless (the "Tomorrow" speech, Act
5.5).

Sympathy for Macbeth is not in any way central to the
play.  His ambition and fall from grace are central.  But if one does feel sympathy for
him, it comes from the above.  He allows himself be deceived by the witches and talked
into Duncan's killing by his wife (and these are conscious decisions).  And he takes
over from there and brings about his own downfall.  That cannot be dismissed by any
insanity.  He is guilty.  But sympathy can exist for him, anyway.  Not because we take
the guilt away, but because we see other characteristics than just evil. 
 

In Shakespeare, in sophisticated literature, characters
are mixtures of positive and negative character traits, as are actual human beings.  We
don't need to make excuses for Macbeth in order to feel sympathy for
him.

What is the summary of Chapter 21 and 22 of The Shakespeare Stealer?I have been sick from school and had missed the class discussion. I was...

In chapter 21 of the book "The Shakespeare Stealer" Nick
is at a loss for words when he finds out that Julian is a girl.   He is irritated when
he realizes that he has been fencing with girl for almost a
year.

Saunder feels sorry for Julian because he knows that
they won't let her continue to perform.    Mrs. Phillips bandages Julian's wound.  The
sharers let her perform since she already knows the lines.  It was nearly p[performance
time and no one had seen Nick.

Widge asks Saunders if he
thought that Wdige could ever be a player.  Widge feels bad about the secret that he
carries and woners how Julian could carry hers for so
long.

They find Nick in an ale house drinking his ale. 
Nick tells them he will go to the Globe when he feels like it.  Nick and a student get
into an argument and then a fight.  They fought with swords and Nick was losing.  He
pulled his dagger and so did the student.  During he fight the student stabs Nick in the
throat.  He falls to the ground and Widge curses the
student.

In chapter 22 Widge picks up a stool and knocks
the blade out of the student's hand.  He checks Nick and realizes the wound has not
severed any arteries.  He dos what he can to stop the flow of
blood.

The authorities come but Nick is not charged.  The
other men had fled.  They return to the theater where Nick asks why Julian hides who she
is.  She tells him because it is worth it to act.

Widge is
given the part of Ophelia in the play since Nick is injured.  He has to take it so the
show can go on.  He thinks to himself that if Julian can play a boy, he can play a
girl.

What do you do when you like somebody, you tell them, and they send you mixed messages in return?

Hi Naomy,

You are learning a
valuable bit of information here...relationships stink!  Okay, that might be a bit
dramatic, but the same forces that make love wonderful are the same ones that make it a
real pain in the keester.

There are lots of possible
explanations for your beau's behavior, so I'll just pick a couple out to blow hot air
about:

1. At your age (and I mean that with respect...not
in a"talking down to" kind of way) young men and women are just starting to get an idea
of what they want out of a "significant other."  It may be that he is still trying to
figure that out and isn't sure if you fit the bill or
not.

2. He probably has little experience with real
relationships and is still figuring out how to act...he will learn this by watching the
behaviors of the people he cares about.  For example, if he does "like you" and he isn't
acting the right way, you're counter-behaviors will give him a clue that he needs to act
differently or risk losing you.

3. He may be a jerk and
might be amusing himself with your affections.

4. Because
you care about him, you probably have a heightened sensitivity to what he
says/does/doesn't do.  You, too, are also learning about the subtle clues of how a
relationship works.  It may be that you are misreading his cues because you care enough
to try to figure them out.

5. Boys, traditionally, mature
more slowly than girls.  If it makes you feel any better, he might be just as confused
about your relationship (or the possibility of a relationship) as you
are.

6.  Boys that age are generally morons.  Men my age
are generally morons.  In fact, guys are pretty dumb when it comes to relationships all
around.

From my perspective, the important thing is the be
honest and assertive about what you want from a relationship while still maintaining
your dignity.  If you don't understand his behavior, ask him directly.  That might seem
a bit forward, but if you do it in a "non-clingy, non-psycho, non-stalker" way there is
no better way to get the answers you are looking
for.

Whatever you do, remember to be yourself.  Be
confident and don't cheapen your worth by chasing someone around who "runs hot and
cold."  Boys like girls that present an obtainable challenge and who take pride in
themselves.  Girls who are too compromising and eager to please (though it runs contrary
to logic) do not earn respect and are not valued  (other than by weirdo, control
freaks.)

Good luck to you.  You are at an exciting age, and
in some ways, I really envy you.  Every door is open and everything is still a
possibility.  Don't sell yourself short.

Given the function 'f(x)=x^2-4x-1' find the inverse of the function f, stating its domainA break down of how the answer is got would be much...

Given the function f(x) = x^2 - 4x
-1

We need to find the inverse function of
f(x).

Let us assume that y=
f(x).

==> y = x^2 - 4x
-1

We will complete the square
.

==> y = x^2 - 4x -1 +4
-4

==> y= x^2 -4x +4 -
5

==> y = (x-2)^2 -
5

Now we will add 5 to both
sides.

==> y+5 =
(x-2)^2

Now we will take the square root of both
sides.

==> sqrt(y+5) =
x-2

Now we will add 2 to both
sides.

==> x = sqrt(y+5) +
2

Then the inverse function
is:

f^-1 (x) = sqrt(x+5) +
2

Now the domain are x values such that the
function is defined.

We know that sqrt(x+5) is defined when
sqrt(x+5) >= 0

==> sqrt(x+5) >=
0

==> x+5 >=
0

==> x >=
-5

Then, the domain is x = [-5,
inf)

What are some changes during the Meiji Restoration?

The major change of the Meiji Restoration was that Japan
modernized in major ways.  It did this because the Perry expedition had shown it just
how far behind the West it was and how vulnerable it was to Western
power.

Because of this, Japan competely remade itself.  The
old feudal system of samurai and daimyo was dismantled.  In its place was put a
government that was officially headed by the emperor but which had a pretty
western-style constitution.  Along with that, the economy was modernized.  The
government pushed hard to make Japan into an industrial country as opposed to the
old-fashioned agrarian country that it had previously been.

Describe how Frankenstein runs from his laboratory and his return -use quotesThanks ;) Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

On a dark, stormy night in which the rain patters
"dismally against the panes of his laboratory window, and his candle nearly extinguishes
itself, Victor Frankenstein notices the yellow eye of his creature open. Now the
features that Victor has so carefully selected somehow seem ugly:  the lustrous black
hair and the pearly white teeth are hideously in contrast to the watery eyes, shrivelled
complexion, and straight black lips.  With life breathed into his creature, Frankenstein
is horrified by its hideous appearance; in fact, Victor is so frightened that he runs
from the laboratory.

In disgust at what he has made,
Frankenstein, having left the laboratory, flees to his bedroom where he falls into a
fitful sleep.  He dreams of Elizabeth whom he holds in his arms, only to have her become
his dead mother, wrapped in a shroud.  At length, the creature appears, lifts the
curtain by the bed, and gazes at Victor. "his jaws opened...while a grin wrinkled his
cheek....," but Victor runs from the room at the "hideous" sight and spends the night
walking up and down in the courtyard.  When mornning comes, Victor Frankenstein flees
the courtyard of such a hideous wretch, and hurries on "although drenched by the rain
which poured form a black and comfortless sky."

As he
walks, Victor comes to the inn and notices his dear friend, Henry Clerval, descending
from the coach.  Victor greets him with joy and Clerval, who is delighted to see him,
also notices the tension in Victor.  But, Victor takes Clerval to his college, and
rushes up to his lodgings as though "expecting a spectre to stand in waiting for him
after he flings open the door.  When there is no one there, Victor is delighted and
returns to Henry. Taking him to his rooms, Victor laughs in delight, jumps over a chair,
and runs nervously around the rooms.  Finally, he collapses in a nervous fever."  When
he becomes conscious, it is many months later and Henry has attended him the entire
time.

Why is the story called ''Happy Endings''?

Margaret Atwood's story "Happy Endings" is titled as such
to make an ironic statement on the nature of conventional marriage.  In the story, John
and Mary get married, and after the initial introduction, there are several choices of
how their marriage may have turned out based on cause-and-effect situations.  Some of
the endings are stereotypically "happy" yet the characters do not seem particularly
happy, while others end up a bit more disastrous.  Atwood uses the nonstandard structure
of the story to make a statement about the nature of relationships.  No one knows what
time and fate are going to bring, and the strength of a couple lies in their ability to
manage whatever might come their way.  Starting off by simply looking for a "happy
ending" trivializes the marriage, and is destined to lead to a most "unhappy"
ending.

The angle of elevation of the top of a tree from a point 50 feet from it's base is 30 degrees . What is the height of the tree.

Let  B be the base of the tree, T the top of the tree. Let
P be the point 50 ft from the base B.

So BP = 50
ft.

BT = height of the tree to be
determined.

Angle BPT = 30
deg.

Angle PBT = 90
degree.

Therefore  in the right angled triangle, BT/BP =
tan30.

Therefore BT = BP*tan30
deg

BT = 50* (1/sqrt3) ft.= 28.87 ft
nearly.

Therefore the height of the tree is 28.87
ft.

The federal government uses tax laws to affect economic desicions. like home mortgage interest. Why do you think this is so? Tax exemtions are...

Any time a tax break is given, it is an incentive, which,
by definition, is mean to motivate large numbers of people to take specific economic
action.  There are secondary effects as well.  When mortgage interest is deductible, it
makes homes more affordable, even if the interest rate is high, since the homeowner will
get some of that money back.  Now you are stimulating the real estate and construction
industries as well as the mortgage lending industry.  As those industries do more
business, theoretically, more taxes are paid by them and it covers some or all of the
original tax break given.  At least, that's how it's supposed to
work.

As for oil exploration, there are at least two major
forces at work to create such an incentive.  One, it is very expensive for the US to
continue to secure, day after day, 66% of its oil through imports from often unstable
regions.  Our military budget exceeds that of all other countries on Earth combined, and
to continue to secure this resource is one of the reasons why that is so.  Second, the
oil companies are some of the most profitable corporations in human history (In the case
of Exxon-Mobil, the most profitable), and that money buys a lot of
influence over the members of Congress who would create such a tax break.  It's the
oldest game in Washington.

In Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, how does George react to others?

Alienated from others as itinerant workers George Milton
and Lennie Small of Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men are vulnerable to
the predatory human tendencies around them.  Aware of man's propensity for cruelty and
his own powerlessness in his isolated condition, George, who must also protect his
mentally deficient friend, is extremely wary, skeptical, and often cynical in his
dealings with others.

When he and Lennie first arrive at
the ranchhouse, he distrustfully asks the old swamper, "What the hell kind of bed you
giving us, anyways?" when he sees a spray for lice.  Even when provided an explanation,
George tells the old man "skeptically" that he is not "so sure." He thoroughly checks
the bunks and asks what type of person the boss is.  Then, after Curley enters, George's
tone is cold and tense as he responds to the son of the boss's questions, and defensive
about Lennie.  Upon Curley's departure, George asks the old man suspiciously what is "on
his shoulder"?  And, as Candy talks of the boss's son, George makes some derogatory
remarks.  Later, he tells Lennie, "I hate that kinda bastard"; he, then, cautions Lennie
to keep away from him.

Regarding Curley's wife, George is
cynical, calling her "jail bait" and cautioning Lennie to avoid her entirely because
"She' gonna make a mess."  When Lennie ogles her one time that she stands in the
ranchhouse doorway, George chides him severely.  Similarly suspicious of others such as
the cruel Carlson who desires to shoot Candy's old dog, George does warm to Slim
after the mule skinner's "calm" invitation to confidence and seeing his "God-like eyes";
in fact, he takes Slim into his confidence by telling him about what happened with
Lennie in Weeds.  Yet, he maintains his mistrust of others, refusing an invitation to go
to town with the other men because, as Lennie tells Crooks, "George is
careful."

The reactions of George represent man's universal
struggle for a place in nature.  It is George's dream to have independence and security,
to be a person in his own right; however, until he can achieve his goal of having a
sanctuary away from others, George senses his vulnerability and knows that he must
protect himself and Lennie by being suspicious of others, who, in their own weakness,
find the strength to oppress others.

What are the differences between a crater and a caldera?It seems that caldera is a larger depression than a crater. But it is hard to recognize...

In strictly volcanic terms, they are two different kinds
of depressions.  A caldera is formed when a large eruption of magma, or lava, leaves a
gigantic empty chamber underground.  The volcanic material above the chamber, usually
made of volcanic rock and tuff, collapses into the empty magma
chamber.

Yellowstone National Park is mostly a giant
caldera, as is the Valles Grande caldera in New Mexico and others--remains of giant
eruptions in the past.

A crater, on the other hand, is
almost always a vent for volcanic activity.  Large volcanoes form when magma and other
material is ejected from a vent, which builds up a cone around the vent, and as more
material vents over time, a mountain is eventually
formed.

Take Mt. St. Helens in Washington State, for
example, the most recent eruption we have to study.  The eruption literally blew away
the top 1800 feet of the mountain, leaving a large crater.  It is not the result of
magma being displaced and then the land above collapsing in on itself, but rather, an
explosive eruption.  There is a large lava dome in the center of the crater as the vent
there continues to do what it has always done, eject magma.

If log7 (a) + loga (7) = 2, what is a?

We have log (7) a + log (a) 7 =
2

We use the relation for logarithms that log a + log b =
log (a*b) and log (a) b = 1 / log(b) a.

log (7) a + log (a)
7 = 2

=> log (7) a + 1/ log (7) a =
2

=> [log (7) a]^2 + 1 = 2* log(7)
a

=> [log (7) a]^2 + - 2* log(7) a + 1 =
0

=> (log(7) a - 1)^2 =
0

=> log(7) a =
1

=> a =
7

The required solution is a =
7.

In Macbeth, analyze Lady Macbeth's sleepwalking in terms of characterization.

Sleep is a prevailing motif in Macbeth.  Shakespeare uses
it throughout the play to show the guilty consciences of  Macbeth and Lady Macbeth.  At
the beginning of the play, after the murder of Duncan, it is Macbeth who is filled with
remorse and guilt.  He is immediately sorry that he committed the act and
cries,

Macbeth
has murdered sleep.

Macbeth shall sleep no
more.

Yet, Lady Macbeth feels
no guilt, no remorse.  She assures her husband that "a little water clears us of this
deed."  She is, unlike Macbeth, thrilled with  the anticipation of how their lives will
change as a result of killing Duncan.

Throughout the play,
Macbeth is troubled with being unable to sleep.  Lady Macbeth refers to his bad dreams,
and his sleepless nights:

readability="6">

You lack the season of all natures,
sleep.

So, it is fitting that
when Shakespeare shows Lady Macbeth's collapse in Act 5 that she displays her delayed
feelings of regret and guilt through sleepwalking--which signifies a very troubled
sleep.  As Lady Macbeth sleepwalks, she references many of the misdeeds committed by her
husband and especially the murder of Duncan that she had planned.  Her sleep in a way
was "murdered" too, and the only way for her to regain the peace she once had is to
die.

In the play, Shakespeare explores the psychological
consequences of committing immoral acts for personal gain.  He shows the devastating
effects of a guilty conscience through the inability to sleep
peacefully.

What characteristics do Guildenstern & Rosencrantz display in Shakespeare's Hamlet, Act IV, scenes ii and iii?

"How all occasions do inform against me," remarks Hamlet
in his final soliloquy, and, certainly, the visit of his boyhood friends, Guildenstern
and Rosencrantz underscore this observaion of the Prince of Denmark regarding the
terrible corruption of the court of Denmark.  Toadies, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern seek
to ingratiate themselves with Claudius, perhaps hoping for political favors, so they
carry out his wish to learn what they can about
Hamlet.  

Fearing Hamlet, Claudius hires the two men to
learn what they can of Hamlet's recent actions, and to take him to England so that
Hamlet can be killed; however, the perspicacious Hamlet realizes that they are no longer
his friends, and he is circumspect with them when they ask what has become of
Polonius:

readability="23">

Tell us where 'tis, that we may take it
thence

And bear it to the
chapel.

Do not believe it
[Hamlet]

Believe what?

That I
can keep your counsel and not mine own.  Besides, to be demanded of a sponge--what
replication should be made by the son of a king?
[Hamlet]

Take you me for a sponge, my
lord?

Ay, sir, that soaks up the king's countenance, his
rewards, his authorities. [Hamlet]
(4.2.5-14)

That Hamlet speaks
to the men in prose rather than verse which the aristocratic characters of Shakespeare
use, also indicates Hamlet's low opinion of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern as obsequious
sycophants.

In Gathering Blue, what does Kira mean when she tells Thomas that the two of them can "make it different" when they fill in the blank places?

In Kira's society, people with handicaps are not allowed
to stay in the village. They are banished to "another" place. Kira has a deformed leg.
She was not sacrificed at birth because of this deformity since her mother was the only
one with skills at dyeing and weaving patterns. Her mother pleaded for her daughter's
life, and the child was allowed to live. Kira's mother taught her the trade of dyeing
threads, a trade no one else in the village had. At her mother's death, Kira is taken in
by the Committee to live in a community "home" to practice the skills that only she
knows. Other orphans are there to nurture their specific skills as well. Kira discovers
not all is as it should be in her village, and she hopes to change the ways of her
people by using those youngster's special talents to subtly make those changes. The
oppressive ways of the Committee could be undermined by using those special talents to
teach change to the everyday, ordinary ways of her people.

Is Larkin an "uncommon poet for the common man" as he has been called?

This is a very apposite quotation that we can apply to
Philip Larkin. What he is famous for is the way his poetry deals with colloquial
language of the United Kingdom. In some poems, he even uses swear words. His poetry,
because of this, is instantly accessible and the use of plain language shows how he
believed in the value of tradition and a suspicion of modern technology and
advancements. Such an approach allows Larkin to really be identified with by the people
of Britain. His cynical bleakness that make up so much of the tone of his poetry
captures the imagination of a post-World War II population that found their country and
their prestige greatly reduced. Thus we can safely say that Larkin was a poet for the
"common man" through the way that he appealed to the everyday citizen of Britain through
his diction and style.

However, we can also clearly argue
that he was an "uncommon poet" in his ability to reach out to all sectors of society and
remove poetry from being the possession of the well-off and educated. Larkin speaks from
his own viewpoint in a number of his poems, and yet each and every one offers unique and
novel reflections on the essential human condition, isolation, loneliness and religion.
You have only to look at a poem like "Church Going" or "Whitsun Weddings" to see that,
in the midst of his accessible language and style, Larkin offers profound philosophical
comment. It it these two aspects coupled together that make him
unique.

India and Bangladesh had a dispute over water rights to the ____ after the Farakka Dam was constructed.

The correct answer to this question is the Ganges River. 
The Farakka Dam, which is also known as the Farakka Barrage, was built across the Ganges
River and was completed in 1975.  The building of this dam has caused issues that have
led to major disputes between India and Bangladesh.

The
point of the Farakka Dam was to divert water from the Ganges into another river during
the dry season.  By diverting the water, India has been accused of contributing to a
number of problems in Bangladesh, one of which desertification.

Why was Dear Mr. Henshaw a Newberry Award winner?

I actually think that the praise heaped upon the book is
due in large part to how it handled the issue of divorce.  In 1983, the reality of
divorce was growing and there was not a clear social understanding of it.  The book does
a great job in handling it from a realistic point of view.  Leigh understands that while
he might wish for his parents to remarry, they won't.  Through his letters, the author
displays the idea that kids have to be able to understand what they can do about their
lot in life and what has to be accepted for what it is.  At the time, children from
divorced settings were viewed as "different."  The book does a very commendable job in
handling the issue with sensitivity and grace, remaking a social issue that was seen as
somewhat "taboo" and making it relevant to young people.  It is difficult to imagine
this in the modern setting, when there is little, if no, stigma associated with
divorce.  This might be one of the reasons why the book was honored with the Newberry
Award.

Solve the nonlinear inequality that has the variable in the denominator. 2/x+3=

We have to solve
2/x+3=<1/x-3

2/(x+3)=<1/(x-3)

=>
2/(x+3) - 1/(x-3) =< 0

=> [2(x-3) - (x+3)]/(x
- 3)(x + 3) =< 0

=> (2x - 6 - x-3)/(x - 3)(x
+ 3) =< 0

=> (x-9)/(x - 3)(x + 3) =<
0

This is less than or equal to 0 if one of the terms is
less than 0 or all the three terms are less than or equal to
0.

If all the three terms are less than or equal to
0:

• (x-9)=< 0 , (x - 3) =< 0 and (x
  + 3) =< 0

=> x=< 9 ,
x=< 3, x=< -3

x=< -3 satisfies all the
three conditions.

If one of the terms is less than or equal
to 0:

• x=< 9 , x > 3 and x >
  -3

=> 9 >= x >
3

• x=< 3 , x > 9 and x > -3
  , gives no solutions

• x=< -3 ,
  x > 3 and x > 9, gives no
  solutions.

Therefore the values
of x are (-inf , -3] U (3 ; 9]

Determine the points on the hyperbola x^2/9 - y^2/4 - 1 = 0 that have x=4

For the hyperbola x^2/9 - y^2/4 - 1 = 0, when x = 4 , we
have

x^2/9 - y^2/4 - 1 =
0

=> 4^2 / 9 - y^2 / 4 - 1 =
0

=> y^2 / 4 = 4^2 / 9  -
1

=> y^2 / 4 = 16 / 9  -
9/9

=> y^2 / 4 =
7/9

=> y^2 =
7*4/9

=> y = (2/3)*sqrt 7 and y = -(2/3)sqrt
7

So the points on the hyperbola that have x = 4
are

(4 , (2/3)*sqrt 7) and ( 4 , -(2/3)sqrt
7)

If Log 4 (x) = 12, then log 2 (x / 4) is equal to what?

Given that log 4 (x) = 12

We
need to find the values of log2 (x/4)

Let us use the
logarithm properties to simplify.

We know that log a/b =
log a - log b

==> log2 (x/4) = log2 x - log2
4

But log2 4 = log2 2^2 = 2*log2 2 =
2

==> log2 (x/4) = log2 x -
2.............(1)

Now we are given that log4 x =
12

We will rewrite.

==>
log4 x = log2 x / log2 4 = log2 x/ 2 = (1/2)log2 x=
12

==> log2 x = 2*12 =
24

==> log2 x/4 = 24 -2 =
22

Then the values of log2 (x/4) =
22

One number is 28 more than three times another number. If each number were multiplied by 4, their difference would be 232. What are the numbers?

We'll note the numbers as x and
y.

We'll put as x the number that is 28 more than three
times y.

We'll write the sentence
mathematically:

x = 28 + 3y
(1)

Now, we'll write mathematically the other constraint
from enunciation:

4(x - y) =
232

We'll divide by 4;

x - y =
58

x = 58 + y (2)

We'll put
(1) = (2):

28 + 3y = 58 +
y

We'll isolate y to the left
side:

3y - y = 58 - 28

2y =
30

y = 15

x = 58 +
y

x = 58 + 15

x =
73

The numbers are: x = 73 and y =
15.

How could Hitler protect animals and limit by law animal experimentation while permitting cruel medical experiments on humans in concentration camps?

This is probably one of the best examples of Hitler's
political and personal cruelty.  In order to consolidate his own power and eliminate
opposition to him, Hitler's design was to deem the enemies of Germany as less than
human.  This dehumanization was what allowed the ease with which so many were tormented
and killed.  It was not that Hitler ever said that "These are bad people."  Rather, he
made the argument that individuals who were against him only did so because they were
actually less than human.  Throughout his writings and speeches, the targeting of
individuals of Jewish faith or homosexuals or gypsies was done so as arguing that the
true standard of being a human being was not met by these groups of people, so keeping
them is a crime against humanity.  This sad and twisted logic was embraced by so many. 
Once the floodgates had opened in robbing people of their humanity though insult,
dehumanizing comments and terms, and targeting a group of people, the abuse,
intimidation, and elimination was easier to accomplish.

How did Nwoye change as a person in Things Fall Apart during the course of the novel (especially in regards to converting to Christianity)?

Nwoye initially tries to keep his interest in Christianity
secret from his father Okonkwo. The son has always find it difficult to fit in the
tribal traditions that mean so much to his father and his conversion is an act of
rebellion against his authority. Nwoye sees Christianity as less violent and patriarchal
than Igbo society and less obsessed by standards of masculinity. He finds himself more
at home in his adoptive religious faith than in the religious beliefs of his own
tradition. Yet, in the subsequent novel No Longer at Ease, the
character is shown as constantly caught in the dilemma of being a Christian but of
having to spend most of his existence within a community of people who still subscribe
to traditional beliefs. Nwoye, or Isaac as he chooses to be called after his convertion
to signify his unwillingness to sacrifice his identity to his father, considers them
heathens. His condition is similar to that described in the epigraph to the novel
No Longer at Ease, the last lines of T.S. Eliot's "The Journey of
the Magi":

We returned to our places, these
Kingdoms,
But no longer at ease here, in the old dispensation,
With
an alien people clutching their gods.
I should be glad of another
death.

In The Great Gatsby, how did Nick deceive Jordan?

This occurs in chapter 3. This is very important because
Nick paints himself as the moral character of the story, and he should, he's the
story-teller and has the right and ability to taint our
viewpoints.

In the end of chapter 3, Nick notes Jordan's
dishonesty. The he points out her carelessness in reference to driving. Finally, he
recognizes something in himself, he is intrigued by her. BUT, HE HAD A GIRL AT HOME.
Yes, there is only one line that really tells us this, but he kept it from Jordan until
he thought a relationship was possible.

He reports to the
reading audience:

readability="12">

"Her gray, sun-strained eyes stared straight
ahead, but she had deliberately shifted our relations, and for a moment I thought I
loved her. But I am slow-thinking and full of interior rules that act as brakes on my
desires, and I knew that first I had to get myself definitely out of that tangle back
home. I'd been writing letters once a week and signing them: 'Love
Nick.'"

Later, in chapter 7,
after the incident with the accident occurs, Tom drives into his home and Nick and
Jordan are left out front. Jordan wants Nick to do something with
her.

"I was
feeling a little sick and I wanted to be alone. But Jordan lingered for a moment more...
I'd be damned if I'd go in; I'd had enough of all of them for one day, and suddenly that
included Jordan too."

Nick
fails to tell her that he wants to be alone or that he is tired of her. But he tells the
reader.

In chapter 9, Nick pretends to be surprised when
Jordan reports she is engaged. He acts like he is happy for her, but he is still in love
with her.

What final recognitions take place in Book XX of The Odyssey?

Book XX of The Odyssey sets the table
for the revenge that begins in Book XXI.  All of the suitors are reintroduced to
Odysseus, and many are cruel to him.  Book XX is the last chapter that Odysseus will
spend in the disguise of the beggar.  But, all of Odysseus' allies recognize him as lord
Odysseus except Penelope.

Book XX reveals two major
recognitions:

1.  Athena wants Odysseus to recognize that
his revenge against the suitors is sanctioned by the gods.  Odysseus has been doubting
his ability to defeat so many of the suitors:

readability="12">

"all that you have said is true, but I
am in some doubt as to how I shall be able to kill these wicked suitors single
handed, seeing what a number of them there always are. And there is this
further difficulty, which is still more considerable. Supposing that with
Jove's and your assistance I succeed in killing them, I must ask you to
consider where I am to escape to from their avengers when it is all
over."

Athena
responds:

readability="16">

"For shame," replied Athena, "why, any one else
would trust a worse ally than myself, even though that ally were only a mortal
and less wise than I am. Am I not a goddess, and have I not protected you
throughout in all your troubles? I tell you plainly that even though there
were fifty bands of men surrounding us and eager to kill us, you should take
all their sheep and cattle, and drive them away with you. But go to sleep; it
is a very bad thing to lie awake all night, and you shall be out of your
troubles before
long."

2.  The suitors and
the readers recognize Telemachus coming into his manhood.  No longer is Telemachus weak
or timid in the midst of the older, brazen suitors.  Telemachus insults them
openly:

. . .
This house does not belong to the people,
but it belongs to Odysseus; he
acquired it; this makes it
mine, and so, you suitors, hold back your spirit
for insults
and blows, or else there may be a quarrel and fight between
us.

As such, the suitors take
offense to his remonstrations--they “bit their lips in amazement / at Telemachos, and
the daring way he had spoken to them.”

What is the big difference between the Socs and the Greasers on the book The Outsiders?put it in your own words and thoughts.

To me, the major difference between these groups is in how
society sees them.  They are both pretty similar, with teens who have problems and who
often turn to violence and gangs to make themselves feel like they are wanted and cared
for.

But the greasers are looked down on by much of
society.  They are seen as the lowlife kids.  Meanwhile, the Socs are much more
respected because they have money and important parents.  Things that they do do not
seem like such a big deal to the community because there is this assumption that they
are basically okay where the greasers are basically punks.

What similarities are there between Othello and other tragic works by Shakespeare?

Most of Shakespeare's tragic plays feature protagonists
who are possessed of a tragic flaw. The flaw is not comprised of actions but of a
tendency in the character's personality that leads him to make poor choices. For Hamlet,
for example, his tragic flaw could be said to be procrastination. For Macbeth, it's
ambition.  For Richard III, it's arrogance. For Othello, it's jealousy. These tragic
flaws are often at the root of the behaviors that cause the play's primary action or
conflict; for example, if Richard were not so arrogant, he wouldn't alienate so many of
his allies. If Othello were less jealous, he wouldn't murder Desdemona based on an
accusation and fabricated evidence.

But alongside tragic
flaws, each of these characters also tends to have a character who brings out the worst
in them: for Hamlet, it's his mother; for Macbeth, his wife; for Othello, his manservant
Iago. These characters can be seen as reflecting the dark side to the protagonist's
personality, a kind of moral mirror that encourages the character's worst
impulses.

Write about the differences between a Ewell, a Cunningham and a Finch in To Kill a Mockingbird.

In the book To Kill a Mockingbird one gets some insight
into the different social status of some of the families within the
story.

The Ewels represent uneducated poor disgusting and
trashy southerners.  Mr. Ewel is an alcoholic who rapes his own daughter and beats his
children.  He has no respect for the law until he needs to use it to his own advantage. 
Even in the courtroom he does not demonstrate respect for the attorneys and judge.  He
also does not value education or work. He is a dishonest and disrespectful
man.

The Cunninghams are also a poor family but the man has
dignity which he deomstrates by repaying his debt to Atticus through barter.  The
children attend school even if they have no money for shoes or decent things and even
food.  They have been taught to be respectful to adults.  Mr. Cunningham will not take
hand-outs and has a great deal of pride.

The Finch's are a
line of southerners who have the respect of the community.  They are
relatively hardworking honest people who have comfortable lifestyles and respect the
rights of other people.  They represent middle class America at the time of the book. 
Although there is a depression, they have food and a
housekeeper.

What in your view are the major differences between L1 acquistion and L2 learning?language and linguistics

In my humble opinion, the major differences between L1
acquisition and L2 learning are:

1. Most people acquire
their mother tongues when they are children. Prior to puberty, anyway. At this time of
life, there are several physiological factors that make acquiring any knowledge easier,
but especially one's first language. Generally speaking, children's brains are like
sponges and information is soaked up much more readily than after they become adults.
Also, the bones of pre-pubescent children have not solidified in their final or adult
shapes. The bones of the jaw are some of these that are still not completely formed,
making it physically easier for a child to make new or unusial sounds over an
adult.

2. When one acquires L1, one is speaking the
lingua franca, or the same language that everyone else is speaking.
Thus, it is normal. There is nothing unusual about it, there is nothing that makes it in
any way a burden. Practicing the language is as easy as turning to anyone and simply
speaking. Learning new words is as easy as pointing and
asking.

This is unlike many people's experiences acquiring
an L2. Often, students acquire an L2 in a setting where most people do not speak that
language, making practice difficult. The necessity of learning the language is often
questioned and the more necessary it is to learn a new language, often the more
burdensome it feels. New vocabulary is sometimes difficult to acquire; one must make
sure that whoever is asked is one who has the correct knowledge. Often, if a word is
obscure, nobody seems to know.

3. When a child
mispronounces a word, it is normal--even cute. Not so for an adult. An adult is given
less grace when he or she mispronounces a word and is seldom considered cute for doing
so. If the child continues to mispronounce a word, his or her peers will make fun of the
child. The same is true to some degree with adults, as well, however, while this may be
a traumatic way to learn, it is less traumatic to be made fun of as a child than as an
adult.

How do Anglo- Indians view Indians and Indians view Anglo- Indians in "Lispeth" by Kipling?

The protagonist is really the only frame of reference that
we have to address the issue of Anglo- Indian perception in Kipling's work.  Lispeth
views Indians as a secondary reality.  She believes that her primary identity is in the
Anglo part of her notion of self.  In being baptized and educated in the Anglo way, she
constructs her identity in accordance to being Anglo in India.  When she recognizes the
betrayal that the English show to her, she understands that she will always be on the
outside.  No matter how hard the Anglo- Indians seek to embrace the Anglo element of
their identity, Kipling seems to be suggesting that they will always be "Indians."  It
is for this reason that Lispeth goes away, becomes "Indian" and embraces Taraka Devi as
her deity and moves every way possible in order to avoid the Anglo conception she used
to be. 

In terms of how Indians view Anglo- Indians,
consider how Lispeth is treated once married to an Indian.  She is beaten and abused,
almost symbolic of how the Anglo- Indians are reduced to banality by the Indians.  The
feeling of superiority and the sense of self that the Anglo- Indians once experienced
has to be beaten out of them.  The fact that Lispeth is abused and ends up decaying with
age is a statement that reflects the tension intrinsic to how the Indians view the
Anglo- Indians.  In this, there is a sense that the Anglo- Indian experiences betrayal
on all ends, reason enough why Lispeth suffers so.

I need a summary of this poem"Sunday Morning" by Wallace Stevens

In Wallace Stevens's masterful and eloquent poem, "Sunday
Morning," the first two stanzas tell the reader about whom and what the poem is
concerned:  an older woman has death on her mind, and all the religious questions
associated with it.  The conflict in her reflections is between the naturalistic and the
"ancient sacrifice," which is a way of describing the central event of Christianity. 
Thus, the central opposition in Wallace's poem is between the natural/pagan and the
supernatural/Christian views.  This opposition is resolved by the argument of the
speaker who convinces the woman contains spirituality
itself.

In the first stanza, a woman lounges in her
peignoir on a Sunday morning, enjoying the natural beauty around her, enjoying her
coffee and oranges, the "green freedom of a cockatoo."  But her reveries are broken by
this Sunday being Easter Sunday; with this occasion
comes  

readability="7">

Encroachment of that old
catastrophe...

Dominion of the blood and
spulchre.

In the second
stanza, the speaker of the poem questions her rejection of the Christian
occasion:

Why
should she give her bounty to the dead?

What is divinity if
it can come

Only in silent shadows and in
dreams?

The speaker contends
that she can find a connection between the religious and the natural worlds by her
becoming "the book," so to speak:

readability="10">

Shall she not find in comforts of the
son,...

Things to be cherished like the thought of
heave?

Divinity must live within
herself

In the third stanza,
the speaker expands his religious focus to the Greek god Jove, whose blood "commingling,
virginal/With heaven." Then, the speaker links Jove's mingling with heaven to the birth
of Christ by connecting it to the star that guided the Wise Men to the birthplace of
Jesus.  Since both myths are disconnected from humanity, man can find the divine in the
natural world.

The woman's voice returns in the next two
stanzas as she questions the argument of the speaker/poet that earthly pleasures can
provide spiritual fulfillment.  While acknowledging that natural beauty "has endured,"
he contends that the eternal beauty of nature is evident in its renewal each spring--"As
April's green endures."  The "chimera of the grave," the dark dreams of Christ's
crucifixion, will not last as will the magnificence of the natural
world.

When the woman
complains,

readability="7">

'But in contentment I still
feel

The need of some imperishable
bliss'

the speaker counters,
"Death is the mother of beauty."  He explains this paradox by explaining that the
prospect of death makes people appreciate beauty/love all the more.  The next stanza
continues this argument.

In the seventh stanza, the speaker
suggests an alternative to traditional worship, likening the dance of the pagans to
"heavenly worship."

Convinced of the speaker's argument,
the woman hears

readability="11">

A voice that cries, 'The tomb in
Palestine

Is not the porch of spirits
lingering.

It is the grave of jesus, where he
lay.'

She acknowleges that
the grave of Jesus is not where there are any mystical spirits.  So, she turns with the
speaker to the "old chaos of the sun," and the beginnings and ends--"Ambiguous
undulations."  The woman is released from the restrictions of the religious world and
embraces the "spontaneous cries" of nature where pigeons make their "ambiguous
undulations."

Suppose a box on a frictionless ramp is being pulled by a rope with a tension of 350 N making an angle of 50 degrees to the horizontal ground.If...

The tension in the rope used by which the box is being
moved is equal to 350 N. The rope makes an angle of 50 degrees with the
horizontal.

The box is on a ramp inclined at 20 degrees. It
is pulled a distance equal to 5 m using the rope.

We can
divide the force exerted by the rope on the box into two components, one that is in the
direction of motion of the box and another which is perpendicular to the direction of
motion of the box.

Work is done only by the component that
is in the direction of motion of the box. This is equal to: 350* cos (50 -
20)

=> 350* cos
30

=> 350* (sqrt 3 /
2)

=> 175* sqrt 3

The
work done is force* distance = 175* sqrt 3 * 5

=>
875* sqrt 3

=> 1515.5
J

The work done in pulling the box is equal
to 1515.5 J

In ONE 'short' paragraph, 'outline' how Albert Bandura's, Dorothy Ross' and Sheila Ross' (1961) psychological research (linked below) has helped...

Bandura, Ross, and Ross argue the philosophy that social
learning is the primary way to acquire a behavior. For this reason, they basically state
that what people see, hear, and live everyday will kind of imprint onto their
subconscious, making them prone to act, talk, and behave the way their peers do. In the
case of murder, if a person lives in a violent environment and exposed to a whole lot of
heavy fighting, shouting, and disregard for human life, the social learning theory would
agree that the person could easily develop aggressive tendencies that could lead easily
to murder.

What is significant about the setting in Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck and what does the novel tell us about friendship?

The setting does change a little in Steinbeck's
Of Mice and Men.  The story begins and ends at somewhat of an
idyllic spot on the edge of water where George and Lennie first appear, and ends in the
same spot, where George shoots Lennie. 

I say somewhat
idyllic because the place is not ideal, it's just the best that Lennie and George get in
the novel.  The water is stagnant, and possibly unsafe to drink.  And the spot includes
at least one dead mouse, the mouse that Lennie has in his pocket when they first arrive
at the site, and that George makes Lennie throw out, because its dead and presumably
decrepit.  The mouse, of course, is indicative and possibly symbolic of other dead
things in the work, including the pet puppy, Candy's dog, Curley's wife, and Lennie
himself. 

The setting does reflect George and Lennie's
dreams, of course, including even the rabbits. 

Notice
again, though, that the rabbits vanish before George and Lennie arrive--Lennie doesn't
get to see them. 

He never gets to see them on a place of
his own, either.  This setting is reflective of the rest of the novel and Lennie's
fate.    

How should people who are against a war go about protesting it? Was the Vietnam war protested in an effective way?

I believe that the protesters were very effective whether
they presented a negative image about themselves or not. After all, they weren't
protesting for themselves.

Vietnam was described as the
first living-room war, in as much as the news could show action that happened only hours
previously, and there was virtually no censorship involved. One result of that was that
the war was not sanitized for the American public. But linked, I think, to this reality
was a realistic broadcast of the anti-war movement. The realistic portrayal of the dead
in Vietnam and the violence associated with the anti-war protests did not win any
supporters for the war. The protesters won no friends but I think it did raise the
conscientiousness level of the public. In this sense, it was a
success.

And yes, as an American citizen if you feel that a
war is going badly, and especially if the war is actually unjust (as so many thought
during Vietnam), you should have the right to voice that opinion. Protest to your
heart's content. But be prepared for the backlash.

A major
difference between Vietnam and Iraq/Afghanistan, and in my opinion a big difference, is
that most troops in Vietnam were drafted and had no legal choice, while our soldiers in
Iraq/Afghanistan are volunteers.

Bless the volunteer
army.

please explain qualitatively: why do electrons in a semiconductor have greater mobility than holes?

In semiconductors, current is often visualized by the flow
of electrons or positively charged holes from atom to atom in the
material.  However, only the electrons are actually free to move.  The
holes are positively charged ions that are created when an electron
leaves the atom.  The location of the hole changes when electrons leave one atome to
fill the hole in another one.

The Englishman says that the boy's progress at the crystal shop is an example of the principle of the Soul of the World. What does he mean?In...

In Paulo Coelho's novel, The
Alchemist, the Englishman is searching for the alchemist in order to learn
the secret of turning common metals into gold. Part of his philosophy of life deals with
the soul.

readability="12">

'That's the principle that governs all things,'
he said. 'In alchemy, it's called the Soul of the World. When you want something with
all your heart, that's when you are closest to the Soul of the World. It's always a
positive force.'...He said that it was not just a human gift, that everything on the
face of the earth had a
soul...

In essence, the
Englishman's philosophy first is that all things have souls: people, plants,
animals...even "a simple thought." In light of this basic principle, it seems that he
believes that the soul draws closer to the Soul of the World by wanting something "with
all his heart"—that this is a positive force that moves one along in life's
journey.

In Santiago's case, the Englishman believes that
his time spent at the crystal shop has brought the young boy closer to the Soul of the
World because his time with the crystal merchant led the boy to
continue his pursuit of his Personal Legend—which he wants with all
his heart—and in this way, it brought Santiago closer to the Soul of the
World.

You find a puddle of a clear liquid on your driveway. it is either water, vinegar or battery acid from the car.how can you safely test the liquid...

A clear liquid on a driveway could safely be tested by
pouring baking soda on it.  If it is vinegar or battery acid it will bubble up.  If it
is water it will do nothing.  However, it will not tell you whether it is vinegar or
battery acid.

Liquids have different attributes that can be
used to identify what they may be:

Color can help determine
a liquid.  Since the liquid was clear we can rule out that helping solve the
problem.

Odors are specific to certain liquids.  Vinegar
has a distinct odor.  Battery acid has its own odor.  Water is
odorless.

Freezing point, liquids have different freezing
points.

Boiling points, liquids have different boiling
points.

Liquids have different
densities.

Getting back to the difference between the three
liquids; Battery acid is acidic and would gradually breakdown a simple material such as
cloth.  One could dip a small piece of cloth in the liquid and remove it.  If the cloth
begins to erode, it is battery acid.

In Hemingway's short story, "In Another Country," do the dead animals hanging outside the shops have any symbolic meaning?

The story begins with a description of the setting, from
the first-person narrator's point of view. It is autumn in Milan; the weather is cold
and "the wind came down from the mountains." He remembers that darkness fell early and
that it was "pleasant along the streets looking in the windows" after the electric
lights had come on in the city. Then his "pleasant" memory is abruptly juxtaposed with
this passage:

readability="9">

There was much game hanging outside the shops,
and the snow powdered in the fur of the foxes and the wind blew their tails. The deer
hung stiff and heavy and empty, and small birds blew in the wind and the wind turned
their feathers.

The passage
can be interpreted as additional details in the narrator's description of his
surroundings, but the specific details he remembers and the language in which he frames
them seem to suggest something more. The deer are lifeless carcasses, "stiff and heavy
and empty." They are empty because they have been gutted. The inanimate bodies of the
little birds and the furry tails of the now lifeless foxes move when the cold wind
reaches them. The language suggests death and its
aftermath.

Since the narrator does not return to this scene
again in the story, any symbolism suggested by these animals is not developed in the
narrative; however, a strong association is suggested between them and the narrator's
recent experiences. He has been to the war and has come to Milan to deal with serious
physical wounds. His language in describing the dead game he observes outside the shop
suggests he has been wounded in another way, as well. Psychologically, the particular
details he recalls imply other lifeless bodies he has seen, those of men at
war.

In Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, I would like to know what the following passage means."As I heard it in hall, I shall hasten to tell anew. As...

For this excerpt from Sir Gawain and the Green
Knight, this is how I translate
it:

"As I heard it in the hall" means
that the speaker heard something, and "I shall hasten to tell anew"
means that the speaker wants to quickly tell what he has heard (in the
hall).

For the next part, the three definitions below may
help:

readability="7.8214285714286">

href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fealty">fealty:
the fidelity [loyalty] of a vassal or feudal tenant to his
lord

href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/derring-do?show=0&t=1298501812">derring-do
- daring action :
daring

href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/meetly">meetly
- suitably; fittingly; properly; in a seemly
manner

I take "As
it was fashioned fealty in tale do derring-do" to mean that what he heard was
a daring tale of loyalty and bravery. "And linked in measures meetly letters
tried and true" means that the story's words and descriptions are "meetly
letters," things that are proper and appropriate: words that are "reliable and true,"
having stood up to the test of time.

I would expect that in
this, the storyteller is giving the qualifications of this story: presenting the story's
credentials, in a way—saying that it is a true story, and the listeners can be sure that
what they hear is the
truth.

Additional
sources:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fealty

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/derring-do?show=0&t=1298501812

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/meetly

In Crispin: The Cross of Lead, who is at the White Stag tavern?

Through bribery, Crispin convinces the guide, whom the
widow arranged to take him to the town walls and safety, to lead him instead to the
White Stag where the conspirators are meeting. So, the conspirators are at the White
Stag. Crispin approaches them for help in arranging an escape for Bear, who is being
held elsewhere. The conspirators decline because the town is heavily guarded but offer
to escort Crispin to the town square.

Once there, Crispin
discovers John Aycliffe and convinces him at knife point to release Bear. Had Crispin
not gotten to the conspirators at the White Stag, he never would have encountered
Aycliffe and Bear would never have escaped. Of course, the escape leads them right into
another ambush or two, but that's for another question.

Find the angle made by line 18x-3y-21=0 with x axis?

We have the equation of the line
18x-3y-21=0.

18x - 3y - 21 =
0

=> -3y = 21 -
18x

=> 3y = -21 +
18x

=> y = -7 + 6x

Now
y = 6x - 2 is in the form where the slope is 6 and the y-intercept is
-7.

The slope of the line is the tangent of the angle it
makes with the x-axis.

So if the angle made is A, tan A =
6

A = arc tan 6.

A = 80.53
degrees.

Therefore the line makes an angle
80.53 degrees with the x- axis.

What happens when the speaker asks the raven to leave?What is the speaker's condition at the end of "The Raven"?

The first answer is more of a literal reading of the
poem.  Many critics do not consider the raven to be a literal bird, but rather a symbol
of death, grief, loss of love, etc.

It is true that the
Raven does not leave at the end of the poem.  Is this likely then, to be an actual
bird?  I think what is really going on, is the speaker cannot get over his lost love,
Lenoire.  At the end of the poem, he has conjured up the courage (and anger) to scream
and cast the Raven (his memory of Lenoire) out of his mind.  But alas, it will not
leave.  He is left with more than depression.  This is his final admittance of
hopelessness and despair.

How did Britian and France try to prevent war with Germany?Please answer as soon as possible

Agreed with the above post.  They buried their heads in
the sand and hoped Hitler would go away, mostly.  Then they ignored him furhter when he
did not, and at their own peril.  However, France did build a large military and an
expensive, massive fortification called the Maginot Line that they believed would be
impossible to breach.  Hitler just "blitzkrieg-ed" around it by going through
Belgium.

They also formed an alliance with one another, and
wth the Soviet Union. They even practiced brinksmanship - a foreign policy where they
threaten war if a certain action is taken, gambling that he will not.  They did this
after Czechoslovakia was taken, and threatened Hitler with war if he invaded Poland. 
It's a way of trying to prevent war by threatening war.  It worked about as well as
appeasement did.