Friday, June 12, 2015

In Much Ado About Nothing, what literary techniques can I compare in Act II scene 3 and Act III scene 1?

I think the main approach you can take would be to look at
the role of irony and how it is played out in these two scenes. Of course, both of these
scenes show the complete turn around of Beatrice and Benedick, and how easily they are
persuaded that they are in love with each other. The irony here is two-fold: firstly,
the massive irony comes from their mutual hatred and the way that they swear they will
never become emotionally involved. Secondly, there is dramatic irony as we and the other
characters know that they are presenting a fabrication of the truth to Beatrice and
Benedick, who just happen to be listening to this carefully staged
ruse.


Note the intense irony of Benedick's words at the
beginning of Act II scene 3:


readability="11">

I do much wonder that one man, seeing how much
another man is a fool when he dedicates his behaviours to love,k will, after he hath
laughed at such shallow follies in others, become the argument of his own scorn by
falling in love. And such a man is
Claudio.



Benedick is so swift
to bemoan the impact of love on Claudio's character, but by the very end of this scene
all it takes is a few overheard comments to turn himself into that very kind of
individual. Likewise, we see with Beatrice exactly the same situation. For all of her
fine words and witty retorts, she is swift to fall in love and believe what she hears.
Irony abounds from start to finish.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Calculate tan(x-y), if sin x=1/2 and sin y=1/3. 0

We'll write the formula of the tangent of difference of 2 angles. tan (x-y) = (tan x - tan y)/(1 + tan x*tan y) ...